Indexed in Journament

Rheumatology Advances in Practice

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.8 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #5,100 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
46 Articles
Scores higher than 82.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name RAP

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 90.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 40.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 90.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 31.2
Community Impact 2.9 13.4
Content Distribution 40.8 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (46)

2025
Living with palindromic rheumatism: a qualitative interview study
29 views DOI Abstract
2026
Treating skin involvement in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: results from an international scleroderma specialist survey
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Nurse-supported self-monitoring of serum urate by gout patients using a treat-to-target approach: a feasibility study
17 views DOI Abstract
2026
Recombinant zoster vaccine immunization rate in patients on janus kinase inhibitors for rheumatologic and dermatologic conditions
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Two lenses, one disease: the power of joint working in SARD ILD to ‘focus’ on the best care
12 views DOI
2026
Turkish adaptation and psychometric testing of the Perceived Workplace Support Scale in people with inflammatory arthritis
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Impact of social deprivation on cancer occurrence and cardiovascular events in systemic sclerosis
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Nine hundred patients evaluated within a median of one day from referral in a very early arthritis clinic in France
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
The incretin–joint axis: weight-independent mechanisms and disease-modifying potential in chronic arthropathies
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
2026
“It helps me stay on track”: patient experiences using a mobile app for self-management of systemic sclerosis with a focus on fatigue in women
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Coexisting juvenile idiopathic arthritis and autoimmune hepatitis type 1 in a child
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Digital gangrene in systemic sclerosis: prevalence, associated factors, and all-cause mortality in a hospitalized cohort from southern China
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Obinutuzumab as salvage anti-CD20 therapy in poly-refractory difficult-to-treat seropositive rheumatoid arthritis
10 views DOI
2026
Association of analgesics prescription with incident comorbidities in people with osteoarthritis—a UK Primary Care database cohort study
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Rapid versus conventional glucocorticoid tapering in pure membranous lupus nephritis: a multicenter retrospective study
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Journament Score
41.8/100 · Below Average
Ranked #5,100 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

40.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.