Living with palindromic rheumatism: a qualitative interview study

Clicks: 32
ID: 310839
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #1 of 47 articles by views in Rheumatology Advances in Practice

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Palindromic rheumatism (PR) is an unpredictable and under-researched inflammatory condition, and patients with PR are at risk of developing inflammatory arthritis (IA). This study aimed to explore patients’ perceptions and experiences of living with PR, including symptoms, impact, treatment outcomes and potential progression to IA. Methods Patients were recruited from ongoing cohort studies identifying individuals at risk of developing IA. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at two UK sites. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Patient research partners co-produced the interview schedule and contributed to coding decisions. Results Eight patients were interviewed. Three themes (seven subthemes) were identified: experiencing symptoms (symptoms, perceptions of triggers, referral experiences); impact of symptoms (activity limitations, psychological impact); treatment expectations and knowledge seeking (treatment outcomes and progression, information and support needs). Symptom severity was likened to that associated with severe physical injury, and PR impacted on daily activities and caused psychological distress, but referral delays were frequently reported. Patients expressed concerns about taking medication for PR, primarily due to side effects. Most highlighted a lack of information about PR (e.g. medication options and self-management advice) but varied in how much they wanted to understand about PR progression and treatment options. Conclusion This study captured valuable insights into the perceptions and experiences of PR, from the perspective of patients. Findings highlight the severity of symptoms and impact of the condition. Further work to standardize classification criteria and outcome measurement in PR is critical to facilitate meaningful clinical trials in this area.
Reference Key
l2025livingwithpalindromi Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors L. Chapman; Zahira Latif; R. Stack; A. Keenan; H. Gul; Paul Emery; K. Mankia; Karim Raza; Heidi J. Siddle
Journal Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Year 2025
DOI
10.1093/rap/rkaf138
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.