Indexed in Journament

Food Quality and Safety

Oxford University Press· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,569 of 20,222 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 42.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Food Quality and Safety
Abbreviated Name Food Quality and Safety

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 90.0
Community Impact 0.7
Content Distribution 34.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Food Quality and Safety
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 29.9
Accessibility 19.8
Timeliness 90.0 39.9
Diversity 30.0
Innovation 37.3
Community Impact 0.7 27.0
Content Distribution 34.0 85.1
Content Quality 54.2
Ethics & Transparency 39.5
Editorial Standards 32.5
Publication Regularity 51.6
Geographic Reach 30.0

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2020
Impact of COVID-19 on the food supply chain
23 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effects of 1-methylcyclopropene on the storage quality of ‘Shine Muscat’ grape
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Thymol contributes to preserving the postharvest freshness of blueberries by enhancing antioxidant and ascorbate-glutathione (AsA-GSH) cycle
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
DNA barcode authentication of genetically modified crops using Cas14a-reporting polymerase chain reaction
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Development of a Rapid RAA-CRISPR-Based Method for Detecting Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in <i>Pseudomonas lundensis</i>
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Calcium and reactive oxygen species metabolism regulate anthocyanin accumulation in ‘Xinqihong’ pear fruit
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Deep learning with keratin/poly lactic acid/thymol/mulberry anthocyanin nanofilm in pork preservation and freshness assessment
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Texture deterioration and cell wall metabolic dynamics in Chinese bayberry ( <i>Morella rubra</i> ) fruit during postharvest storage
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Endolysin LysPEF52H from <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> phage PEF-SWUN52H: a potential antibacterial agent
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Promotive effects of exogenous 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) on the biosynthetic pathway of volatile aromatic compounds in tomato fruits
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
2026
Development of a Rapid RAA-CRISPR-Based Method for Detecting Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in <i>Pseudomonas lundensis</i>
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Machine learning–assisted surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for multiple and rapid screening of foodborne pathogenic bacteria
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effects of 1-methylcyclopropene on the storage quality of ‘Shine Muscat’ grape
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Near-freezing temperature storage preserves prune quality by modulating respiratory and energy metabolism
1 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,569 of 20,222 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

0.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

34.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.