journal of landscape research and practices (jolarp) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#91 / 33,622
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
47.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
60
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
42
Community Impact
30
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

journal of landscape research and practices (jolarp)

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name j lands res prac
Abbreviated Name jolarp
ISSN 2687-2366
Aim and Scope Journal of Landscape Research and Practices (JOLARP) is an international, scientific, peer-reviewed, open access journal. It's aim is to share the results of high quality research as well as good planning and design practices on landscapes in general and in the field of Landscape Architecture in particular with scientific world. Original research articles, high quality review articles and articles describing good planning and design practices either in English or in Turkish are accepted for the journal. Priority is given to research articles. Original research articles are expected to contain theoretical and experimental results. In the review articles, it is expected that scientific, technological and current developments on a specific subject are reflected by using an extensive bibliography. Articles describing good planning and design cases are expected to explain planning and design approaches and concepts and also unique aspects of these studies.
URL https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/paud
Author Instructions https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/paud/writing-rules

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2025
OUTDOOR FURNITURE DESIGN WITH AN ECOLOGICAL APPROACH TO IMPROVE AIR QUALITY
Makbulenur Onur;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
40 views DOI Abstract
2024
Akarsu Peyzajlarının Restorasyonu ve Suining Güney Kıyı Parkı
Hafize Nur Sılay Emir;Emrah Yıldırım;Elif Parlak;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
36 views DOI Abstract
2025
THE ROLE OF GREEN SPACES IN POST-DISASTER RECOVERY: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY AMONG MIGRANT SURVIVORS OF THE 6 FEBRUARY EARTHQUAKES IN EDİRNE, TÜRKİYE
Emel Baylan;Eylem Akgül Yalçin;Zelal Özcan;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 27-35
26 views DOI Abstract
2024
Su Öğesi Tasarımında Derinlik Miktarını Etkileyen Faktörler
Şengül Yilmaz;Tahsin Yılmaz;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 19-24
25 views DOI Abstract
2025
IS HISTORICAL LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT FOCUSED ON THE LANDSCAPE ITSELF OR THE HISTORY OF LANDSCAPE?
Sara Demir;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 36-51
22 views DOI Abstract
2024
SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK YAKLAŞIMIYLA EŞİTSİZLİĞE KARŞI PEYZAJ TASARIM STRATEJİLERİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ
Özlem Arslan;Sema Mumcu;
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 1-21
22 views DOI Abstract
2023
PEYZAJ MİMARLIĞINDA ESTETİK VE ESTETİĞİN SAYISALLAŞTIRILMASI: KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR YÖNTEM ÖNERİSİ
Alper Uzunali;Cengiz Acar;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 32-41
22 views DOI Abstract
2025
SMART CITY APPLICATIONS AND THE ROLE OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN IN MASS HOUSING: THE FUTURE OF URBAN LIFE
Furkan Tahsin Çelik;Ahmet Benliay;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 13-20
21 views DOI Abstract
2024
Kıyı Bölgesinin Mekansal Dönüşümü ve Kıyı Kullanımlarının
Regaip Yılmaz;Doruk Görkem Özkan;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 12-18
18 views DOI Abstract
2025
OBSERVATIONAL RESEARCH BASED ON SOCIAL MESSAGING DATA TOWARDS QUALITY CLASSIFICATION IN LANDSCAPE PLANTS
Yusuf Evren Dogan;Erhan Vecdi Küçükerbaş;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 21-26
16 views DOI Abstract
48
Overall
Below Average
30
60
30
42
30
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

47.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

60.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

42.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

30.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.