Indexed in Journament

Review of Law and Social Sciences

ISSN 3078-1574· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
50.4 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #55 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
11 Articles
Scores higher than 99.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Review of Law, and Social Sciences (RLSS) is a multidisciplinary open-access journal with a mission to make research and knowledge accessible to everyone without discrimination. Our vision is based on inclusivity, dissemination, and the power of collective wisdom. The journal’s broad scope facilitates the discovery of connections between disciplines and communities. We strive to help researchers communicate with a global audience and interact with experts from across the social science community and beyond. Each submission is evaluated on its own scholarly merit and research integrity, and our expert academic editors take an objective and constructive approach to peer review. RLSS considers original research articles and reviews in the following branches of social sciences: Criminal Justice Criminology Law Economics & Finance Education Psychology Geography African Studies Asian Studies Politics & International Relations Media & Communication Studies Politics Sociology Social Work Sport and Leisure Tourism and Hospitality
Short Name Review of Law and Social Sciences
Abbreviated Name RLSS
ISSN 3078-1574
URL https://dialogueshss.com/index.php/dhss/index
Author Instructions https://reviewlawsocialsciences.com/index.php/rlss/GuidelinesforAuthors

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 70.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 88.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Review of Law and Social Sciences
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 30.0 20.4
Timeliness 70.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 8.6 5.8
Content Distribution 88.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (11)

2025
The Role of Universities in Building Strong Institutions as a Sustainable Development Goal
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 01-14
235 views DOI Abstract
2025
Factors Contributing to On-campus Drug use among Students: A Study of the Boys’ Hostels in the University of Peshawar
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 23-38
234 views DOI Abstract
2025
Criminal Liability for Cyberbullying in Jordanian Legislation
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 99-111
233 views DOI Abstract
2025
The Kurdish case, genocide or victims of politics? Legal memories from Al-Anfal
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 113-126
228 views DOI Abstract
2025
Climate Change Challenges on Environmental and Sustainable Development
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 39-49
227 views DOI Abstract
2025
Culture Efficacy: An Alternative to Collective Efficacy
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 155-177
218 views DOI Abstract
2025
Research on the Jurisprudence and Practice of International Disaster Relief
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 125-137
208 views DOI Abstract
2025
Exploring the Phenomenon of Ogling: Impacts and Coping Mechanisms in Pakistani Society
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 51-67
197 views DOI Abstract
2025
E-government and the Legal Culture in Eastern European Countries
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 69-86
194 views DOI Abstract
2025
Organizational Development and Corporate Law Excellence: A Perspective of Human Resource Development and Behavioral Training
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 15-21
192 views DOI Abstract
2025
Culture Efficacy: An Alternative to Collective Efficacy
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 155-177
218 views DOI Abstract
2025
Pakistan’s Evolving Relations with Central Asia: A Case Study of Connectivity Projects
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 141-154
119 views DOI Abstract
2025
Research on the Jurisprudence and Practice of International Disaster Relief
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 125-137
208 views DOI Abstract
2025
The Kurdish case, genocide or victims of politics? Legal memories from Al-Anfal
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 113-126
228 views DOI Abstract
2025
Criminal Liability for Cyberbullying in Jordanian Legislation
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 99-111
233 views DOI Abstract
2025
E-government and the Legal Culture in Eastern European Countries
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 69-86
194 views DOI Abstract
2025
Exploring the Phenomenon of Ogling: Impacts and Coping Mechanisms in Pakistani Society
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 51-67
197 views DOI Abstract
2025
Climate Change Challenges on Environmental and Sustainable Development
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 39-49
227 views DOI Abstract
2025
Factors Contributing to On-campus Drug use among Students: A Study of the Boys’ Hostels in the University of Peshawar
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 23-38
234 views DOI Abstract
2025
Organizational Development and Corporate Law Excellence: A Perspective of Human Resource Development and Behavioral Training
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 15-21
192 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
50.4/100 · Average
Ranked #55 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

50.4/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

88.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.