journal of graduate medical education | Journament

Journal Ranking

#669 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

journal of graduate medical education

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name j grad med educ
Abbreviated Name j grad med educ
ISSN 1949-8357
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.jgme.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2019
The International Literature on Teaching Faculty Development in English-Language Journals: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Core Topics.
Philibert, Ingrid;Konopasek, Lyuba;Riddle, Janet;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 47-63
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Contrasting Residency Training in Japan and the United States From Perspectives of Japanese Physicians Trained in Both Systems.
Heist, Brian S;Torok, Haruka Matsubara;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 125-133
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Design and Implementation of a Peer-Reviewed Medical Education Video Competition: The Best of American Thoracic Society Video Lecture Series.
Seam, Nitin;Richards, Jeremy B;Kritek, Patricia A;Khemasuwan, Danai;McCallister, Jennifer W;Santhosh, Lekshmi;Prasad, Bharati;Bhargava, Sumit;Clay, Alison S;Crotty Alexander, Laura E;
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 592-596
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Putting Time in Perspective: An Integrated Graduate Medical Education Institutional Dashboard and Report Card.
Andrada, Jillian;Teo, Joyce;Neo, Joel;Yeo, Helen;Leng, Lim Boon;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 169-176
325 views DOI Abstract
2011
Developing educators, investigators, and leaders during internal medicine residency: the area of distinction program.
Kohlwes, R Jeffrey;Cornett, Patricia;Dandu, Madhavi;Julian, Katherine;Vidyarthi, Arpana;Minichiello, Tracy;Shunk, Rebecca;Jain, Sharad;Harleman, Elizabeth;Ranji, Sumant;Sharpe, Brad;O'Sullivan, Patricia;Hollander, Harry;
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 535-40
324 views DOI Abstract
2017
Straight Line Scoring by Clinical Competency Committees Using Emergency Medicine Milestones.
Beeson, Michael S;Hamstra, Stanley J;Barton, Melissa A;Yamazaki, Kenji;Counselman, Francis L;Shayne, Philip H;Holmboe, Eric S;Muelleman, Robert L;Reisdorff, Earl J;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 716-720
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
Postgraduate Research Methods Instruction in Africa: A MicroResearch Approach to the Postgraduate Thesis.
Onguka, Stephanie;Wechuli, Geoffrey M;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 197-199
300 views DOI
2019
Diplomate Perceptions and Public Expectations of Board Certification: A Commentary.
Berkowitz, Carol D;
Vol. 11 , No. 6 , pp. 654-655
292 views DOI
2019
Trait Emotional Intelligence and Its Correlates in Oman Medical Specialty Board Residents.
Al Huseini, Salim;Al Alawi, Mohammed;Al Sinawi, Hamed;Al-Balushi, Naser;Jose, Sachin;Al-Adawi, Samir;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 134-140
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using Gamification to Understand Accreditation in Postgraduate Medical Education
Akdemir, N.
Vol. 11 , pp. 207-210
269 views DOI
View All 16 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.