Indexed in Journament

journal of graduate medical education

ISSN 1949-8357· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,904 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 38.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j grad med educ
Abbreviated Name j grad med educ
ISSN 1949-8357
URL https://www.jgme.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of graduate medical education
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 37.0 28.8
Innovation 34.5 31.2
Community Impact 10.7 13.4
Content Distribution 75.4 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2019
The International Literature on Teaching Faculty Development in English-Language Journals: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Core Topics.
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 47-63
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Design and Implementation of a Peer-Reviewed Medical Education Video Competition: The Best of American Thoracic Society Video Lecture Series.
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 592-596
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Contrasting Residency Training in Japan and the United States From Perspectives of Japanese Physicians Trained in Both Systems.
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 125-133
369 views DOI Abstract
2011
Developing educators, investigators, and leaders during internal medicine residency: the area of distinction program.
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 535-40
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Putting Time in Perspective: An Integrated Graduate Medical Education Institutional Dashboard and Report Card.
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 169-176
363 views DOI Abstract
2017
Straight Line Scoring by Clinical Competency Committees Using Emergency Medicine Milestones.
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 716-720
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diplomate Perceptions and Public Expectations of Board Certification: A Commentary.
Vol. 11 , No. 6 , pp. 654-655
346 views DOI
2019
Postgraduate Research Methods Instruction in Africa: A MicroResearch Approach to the Postgraduate Thesis.
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 197-199
336 views DOI
2019
Trait Emotional Intelligence and Its Correlates in Oman Medical Specialty Board Residents.
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 134-140
325 views DOI Abstract
2023
ENTRUST: A Serious Game-Based Virtual Patient Platform to Assess Entrustable Professional Activities in Graduate Medical Education.
Vol. 15 , pp. 228-236
40 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diplomate Perceptions and Public Expectations of Board Certification: A Commentary.
Vol. 11 , No. 6 , pp. 654-655
346 views DOI
2019
Design and Implementation of a Peer-Reviewed Medical Education Video Competition: The Best of American Thoracic Society Video Lecture Series.
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 592-596
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Postgraduate Research Methods Instruction in Africa: A MicroResearch Approach to the Postgraduate Thesis.
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 197-199
336 views DOI
2019
Contrasting Residency Training in Japan and the United States From Perspectives of Japanese Physicians Trained in Both Systems.
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 125-133
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Trait Emotional Intelligence and Its Correlates in Oman Medical Specialty Board Residents.
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 134-140
325 views DOI Abstract
2019
The International Literature on Teaching Faculty Development in English-Language Journals: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Core Topics.
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 47-63
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Dialogic Approach to Teaching Person-Centered Care in Graduate Medical Education.
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 460-467
270 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Internship Year: A Potential Missed Opportunity to Expand Medical Access in International Settings.
Vol. 11 , No. 4 Suppl , pp. 30-33
213 views DOI
Journament Score
33.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,904 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

37.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

34.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.