A Dialogic Approach to Teaching Person-Centered Care in Graduate Medical Education.
Clicks: 274
ID: 20945
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
68.8
/100
274 views
196 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #11 of 16 articles by views in journal of graduate medical education
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Training future physicians to provide compassionate, equitable, person-centered care remains a challenge for medical educators. Dialogues offer an opportunity to extend person-centered education into clinical care. In contrast to discussions, dialogues encourage the sharing of authority, expertise, and perspectives to promote new ways of understanding oneself and the world. The best methods for implementing dialogic teaching in graduate medical education have not been identified.We developed and implemented a co-constructed faculty development program to promote dialogic teaching and learning in graduate medical education.Beginning in April 2017, we co-constructed, with a pilot working group (PWG) of physician teachers, ways to prepare for and implement dialogic teaching in clinical settings. We kept detailed implementation notes and interviewed PWG members. Data were iteratively co-analyzed using a qualitative description approach within a constructivist paradigm. Ongoing analysis informed iterative changes to the faculty development program and dialogic education model. Patient and learner advisers provided practical guidance.The concepts and practice of dialogic teaching resonated with PWG members. However, they indicated that dialogic teaching was easier to learn about than to implement, citing insufficient time, lack of space, and other structural issues as barriers. Patient and learner advisers provided insights that deepened design, implementation, and eventual evaluation of the education model by sharing experiences related to person-centered care.While PWG members found that the faculty development program supported the implementation of dialogic teaching, successfully enabling this approach requires expertise, willingness, and support to teach knowledge and skills not traditionally included in medical curricula.
| Reference Key |
kuper2019ajournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Kuper, Ayelet;Boyd, Victoria A;Veinot, Paula;Abdelhalim, Tarek;Bell, Mary Jane;Feilchenfeld, Zac;Najeeb, Umberin;Piquette, Dominique;Rawal, Shail;Wong, Rene;Wright, Sarah R;Whitehead, Cynthia R;Kumagai, Arno K;Richardson, Lisa; |
| Journal | journal of graduate medical education |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.4300/JGME-D-19-00085.1
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.