Indexed in Journament

PNAS nexus

ISSN 2752-6542· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,201 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
90 Articles
Scores higher than 37.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name PNAS Nexus
Abbreviated Name PNAS Nexus
ISSN 2752-6542

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 100.0
Innovation 7.5
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 21.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 100.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 7.5 31.2
Community Impact 4.3 13.4
Content Distribution 21.5 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (90)

2024
Large language models can infer psychological dispositions of social media users.
Peters, Heinrich;Matz, Sandra C;
Vol. 3 , No. 6 , pp. pgae231
129 views DOI Abstract
2025
Assessing the capacity of agricultural research and development to increase the stability of global crop yields under climate change.
Iizumi, Toshichika; Sakai, Toru; Masaki, Yoshimitsu; Oyoshi, Kei; Takimoto, Takahiro; Shiogama, Hideo; Imada, Yukiko; Makowski, David
Vol. 4 , pp. pgaf099
69 views DOI Abstract
2026
Transient YAP activation uncovers the neurogenic potential of proliferative mammalian Müller glia
English J Laserna, Irina V. Saltykova, Benjamin M. Hall, Xuefei Tong, Justin Dhindsa, Borna Sarker, Ayrea E Hurley, Paul G. Swinton, William R. Lagor, Nicholas M. Tran, James F. Martin, Ross A. Poché
47 views DOI Abstract
2026
Persistent collaboration as a structural signature of scientific resilience
Hong Chen, Yi Bu, Zhong Lu, Caifan Du, Eric T. Meyer, Ying Ding, Jianxi Gao
33 views DOI Abstract
2026
Capillary bifurcations mechanically dissociate clusters of tumor cells
Angelos Vrynas, Aisher Chen, G. Kontaxi, Sam H. Au
32 views DOI Abstract
2026
Reduced incidence of arrest following an extreme risk protection order among respondents in California
Veronica A. Pear, Julia P. Schleimer, Aaron B. Shev, Garen J. Wintemute, Shannon Frattaroli, April M. Zeoli
29 views DOI Abstract
2026
A statistical physics framework for optimal learning
Francesca Mignacco, Francesco Mori
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
In the <i>IMD2</i> gene of <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> , the expression memory suppresses the induction of expression during GTP depletion
Takuma Yokosawa, Takahito Ayano, Masaya Oki
24 views DOI Abstract
2026
Motor neurons integrate cholinergic inputs through spatial organization of diverse nicotinic receptors
Ankura Sitaula, Komal Kaur, Arianna Mogharrabi, Lizzy Olsen, Aref Zarin
24 views DOI Abstract
2026
A model-based approach to study ant energetics from trajectory data
Basit Yaqoob, Michael Napoli, Nicola Pugno, Maurizio Porfiri
22 views DOI Abstract
2026
Evolution of complex organelles in ocelloid-bearing dinoflagellates
Elizabeth C. Cooney, Corey C. Holt, Gordon Lax, Patrick J Keeling
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Recognition of two potential warming events in the Paleocene terrestrial record of North America and associated mammalian responses
Ross Secord, Daniel J. Peppe, Thomas E. Williamson, Caitlin E. Leslie, Stephen L. Brusatte, Andrew G. Flynn
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Video-rate label-free molecular mapping in living plant tissue with a deployable optical encoder
Alexander Ingold, Richard G. Baird, Dasmeet Kaur, Nidhi Dwivedi, Reed Sorenson, Leslie Sieburth, Chang‐Jun Liu, Rajesh Menon
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
The global structure of classroom social networks predicts academic and psycho-social adjustment
Claudia Neuendorf, Naoki Masuda, Kou Murayama
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Is entropy objective? rethinking the foundations of irreversibility and the second law
Juan M. R. Parrondo
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Knotted folds induced by homochiral all-parallel (or all-antiparallel) double-helices
Stephen T. Hyde, Myfanwy E. Evans, N Taylor, Callum A R Metzke
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
11β-HSD2 buffers fetal glucocorticoid exposure inducing Per1 expression under maternal stress
Kazuya Yabumoto, Yasuhiro Umemura, Hitomi Watanabe, Yasuhiro Endo, Nobuya Koike, Akiyo Kakibuchi, Akira Sugimoto, Taisuke Mori, Gen Kondoh, Kazuhiro Yagita
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Neural integrator and orchestrator communities shape spontaneous signaling in the human brain
Lorenzo Pini, Ranieri Dugo, Paolo Pigato, M. Corbetta
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Structural identifiability of constitutive relations from indirect field observations
Y. Sungtaek Ju
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
The fallopian tube: Biosensor and dynamic regulator of preimplantation development
Kalli K. Stephens, Jiude Mao, Wipawee Winuthayanon
6 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,201 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

7.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

21.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.