Structural identifiability of constitutive relations from indirect field observations

Clicks: 1
ID: 325793
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #79 of 88 articles by views in PNAS nexus

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Constitutive relations — functions linking a local state variable to a material or system property such as thermal conductivity, hydraulic permeability, or reaction rate constant — appear across the physical, engineering, and life sciences. They must often be inferred from sparse, indirect observations of the field they govern rather than from direct assays. Unlike the well-studied spatially varying parameter ϕ(x), the scalar state-dependent function ϕ(u):R→R+ of a single local state variable has received no systematic Bayesian treatment, and a basic question remains open: how much can sparse indirect observations actually inform ϕ(u)? We show the answer is governed by a two-factor attenuation: information must pass first through the inverse of the linearized PDE Jacobian and then through the sparse observation mask. The product of these factors lies far below unity for practical configurations, leaving the posterior structurally prior-dominated regardless of the number of indirect observations of the same type and configuration. The primary determinant is not the PDE class but the coupling mechanism — whether ϕ(u) enters the residual through a spatial gradient (as for diffusion coefficients) or pointwise (as for source terms). We instantiate the analysis in a sparse variational Gaussian process with an explicit, checkable prior and a closed-form Laplace posterior, and validate it across four PDE classes, four constitutive shapes, and two prior conditions. A small number of direct constitutive measurements at well-placed state values, bypassing the PDE entirely, collapse the posterior where arbitrarily many indirect observations of the same type cannot.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203868768 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Y. Sungtaek Ju
Journal PNAS nexus
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag281
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag281
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.