Risk perception, but not response efficacy, linked risk communication to protective action during an atmospheric river in California

Clicks: 61
ID: 330369
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #8 of 138 articles by views in PNAS nexus

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 138 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Whether and how risk communication motivates individuals to take protective action over the course of extreme weather events is a central question for public policy. Yet to date, such evidence has been difficult to obtain due to the challenges of forecasting events, rapidly recruiting populations in at-risk locations, and fielding longitudinal studies as conditions unfold. In February 2026, forecasts of an atmospheric river threatening northern California provided an opportunity to examine how risk communication related to protective action in real time. As the atmospheric river approached and made landfall, we surveyed 513 at-risk adults twice daily over one week (n = 5,099 observations) and applied preregistered Bayesian within-person mediation models to the resulting intensive longitudinal data. We found that when participants received more risk communication than their personal average, they were more likely to take protective action. This within-person relationship was explained by changes in risk perception, but not response efficacy. Unexpectedly, receiving more risk communication than usual was associated with lower response efficacy, even though higher levels of response efficacy were associated with a higher likelihood of taking protective action. Taken together, these findings lend empirical support to policy priorities that use risk communication to promote protective action during extreme weather events, such as the United Nations’ Early Warnings for All initiative. Still, risk communication could be even more effective by building confidence that specific actions reduce harm, in addition to raising awareness of the threat.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214741647 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Michelle Ng, Andrea Schumacher, Nilám Ram, Natalie Herbert, Gabrielle Wong‐Parodi, Robert Prestley, Rebecca E. Morss, Julie L. Demuth
Journal PNAS nexus
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag332
URL
https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag332/71456842/pgag332.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.