mini reviews in medicinal chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#376 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 hours ago

mini reviews in medicinal chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name mini rev med chem
Abbreviated Name mini rev med chem
ISSN 1875-5607
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2018
Design, Synthesis, SAR Study, Antimicrobial and Anticancer Evaluation of Novel 2-Mercaptobenzimidazole Azomethine Derivatives.
Tahlan, Sumit;Narasimhan, Balasubramanian;Lim, Siong Meng;Ramasamy, Kalavathy;Mani, Vasudevan;Shah, Syed Adnan Ali;
519 views DOI Abstract
2019
2-Mercaptobenzimidazole Schiff Bases: Design, Synthesis, Antimicrobial Studies and Anticancer Activity on HCT-116 Cell Line.
Tahlan, Sumit;Narasimhan, Balasubramanian;Lim, Siong Meng;Ramasamy, Kalavathy;Mani, Vasudevan;Shah, Syed A A;
Vol. 19 , No. 13 , pp. 1080-1092
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pharmacophores modeling in terms of prediction of theoretical physico-chemical properties and verification by experimental correlations of Carbacylamidophosphates (CAPh) and Sulfanylamidophosphates (SAPh) Tested as New Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors.
Amirkhanov, Vladimir;Rauf, Abdur;Hadda, Taibi Ben;Ovchynnikov, Vladimir;Trush, Viktor;Saleem, Muhammad;Raza, Muslam;Rehman, Tayyeba;Zgou, Hsaine;Shaheen, Usama;Farghaly, Thoraya;
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Design of Metal-Organic Frameworks for pH-Responsive Drug Delivery Application.
Shen, Xin;Pan, Ying;Sun, Zhihao;Liu, Dong;Xu, Hongjia;Yu, Qian;Trivedi, Manoj;Kumar, Abhinav;Chen, Jinxiang;Liu, Jianqiang;
Vol. 19 , No. 20 , pp. 1644-1665
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring the chemistry and therapeutic potential of triazoles: A comprehensive literature review.
Jain, Ankit;Piplani, Poonam;
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
First Synthesis for Bis-Spirothiazolidine Derivatives as a Novel Heterocyclic Framework and Their Biological Activity.
Flefel, Eman M;Sofany, Walaa I;Awad, Hanem M;Shahat, Mahmoud El-;
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
Coumarin Hybrids: Promising Scaffolds in the Treatment of Breast Cancer.
Bhatia, Rohit;Rawal, Ravindra K;
286 views DOI Abstract
2019
The roles of Flavonoles/Flavonoids in Neurodegeneration and Neuroinflammation.
Calis, Zehra;Mogulkoc, Rasim;Baltaci, Abdülkerim Kasim;
272 views DOI Abstract
2019
Medicinal Importance of Azo and Hippuric Acid Derivatives.
Tahir, Tehreem;Ashfaq, Muhammad;Asghar, Humna;Shahzad, Mirza I;Tabassum, Rukhsana;Ashfaq, Areeba;
Vol. 19 , No. 9 , pp. 708-719
263 views DOI Abstract
2017
New Progress in Azole Compounds as Antimicrobial Agents.
Zhang, Hui-Zhen;Gan, Lin-Ling;Wang, Hui;Zhou, Cheng-He;
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 122-166
260 views Abstract
View All 22 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.