international journal of bank marketing | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2063 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 days ago

international journal of bank marketing

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name international journal of bank marketing
Abbreviated Name international journal of bank marketing
ISSN 0265-2323
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2014
How to recover trust in the banking industry? A game theory approach to empirical analyses of bank and corporate customer relationships
Dahlstrom, R.
Vol. 32 , pp. 268-278
372 views DOI
2018
Trust, commitment, customer intimacy and customer loyalty in Islamic banking relationships
Tabrani, M.
Vol. 36 , pp. 823-848
359 views DOI
2003
Relationship marketing: Customer commitment and trust as a strategy for the smaller Hong Kong corporate banking sector
Adamson, I.
Vol. 21 , pp. 347-358
337 views DOI
2006
The influence of attraction on internet banking: An extension to the trust-relationship commitment model
Kassim, N.
Vol. 24 , pp. 424-442
282 views DOI
2019
The impact of cognitive style, consumer demographics and cultural values on the acceptance of Islamic insurance products among American consumers
Paton, Schmidt A.
, pp. 0-0
269 views DOI
2011
el registro más completo de un hoplophorini (xenarthra: glyptodontidae) para los pisos/edades chapadmalalense-marplatense (plioceno tardío-pleistoceno temprano) the most complete record of a hoplophorini (xenarthra: glyptodontidae) for the chapadmalalan-marplatan stages (late pliocene-early pleistocene)
;Alfredo E Zurita;Cristian Oliva;Alejandro Dondas;Esteban Soibelzon;Federico I Isla
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 69-75
253 views Abstract
2017
The influence of culture on trust in B2B banking relationships
Houjeir, R.
Vol. 35 , pp. 495-515
252 views DOI
1998
Relationship banking and the management of organisational trust
Seal, W.
Vol. 16 , pp. 102-107
249 views DOI
2018
Adoption of internet banking services in Gujarat: An extension of TAM with perceived security and social influence
Patel, K.
Vol. 36 , pp. 147-169
246 views DOI
2017
Building customer loyalty in digital banking: A study of bank staff’s perspectives on the challenges of digital CRM and loyalty
Larsson, A.
Vol. 35 , pp. 858-877
223 views DOI
View All 21 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.