acdi: anuario colombiano de derecho internacional | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1723 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

acdi: anuario colombiano de derecho internacional

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name acdi: anuario colombiano de derecho internacional
Abbreviated Name acdi: anuario colombiano de derecho internacional
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2010
Internal Displacement, the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement, the Principles Normative Status, and the Need for their Effective Domestic Implementation in Colombia.
Goldman, Robert K.;
Vol. 2 , pp. -
342 views Abstract
2012
reference framework for developing android applications
;Sidgley Camargo de Andrade;Tania Fatima Calvi Tait
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 2-11
285 views DOI Abstract
2014
trabalhando lógica de programação com portadores de deficiência auditiva: a experiência com a linguagem proglib e a ide hands
;Ronnie Edson de Souza Santos;Cleyton V. C. Magalhães;Jorge S. Correia-Neto;Leandro M. Queiros;Guilherme Vilar
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 32-44
267 views DOI Abstract
2016
análise comparativa de detectores e descritores de características locais em imagens no âmbito do problema de autocalibração de câmeras
;Darlan Nunes Brito;Flávio Luis Cardeal Pádua;Aldo Peres Campos e Lopes;Daniel Hasan Dalip
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 85-99
242 views DOI Abstract
2011
proposed support decision making system for the remote monitoring of commercial and residencial central alarm systems
;Alex Luiz de Sousa;André Bittencourt Leal;Ricardo Ferreira Martins;Claudio Cesar de Sá
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 17-29
215 views DOI Abstract
2014
ontology supported system for searching evidence of wild animals trafficking in social network posts
;Rafael da Silva Carrasco;Alcione de Paiva Oliveira;Jugurta Lisboa Filho;Alexandra Moreira
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 16-31
179 views DOI Abstract
2010
avaliação de crianças deficientes visuais através de jogos neuropedagógicos
;Carla Verônica Marques;Carlo Emmanuel Tolla;Claudia Motta;Samantha Vrabl;Fábio Lapolli;Lúcio Ângelo;Luciana Daflon
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 28-40
169 views DOI Abstract
2010
sistema integrado para construção de inferências aplicáveis a jogos psicopedagógicos
;Diogo da Silva Magalhães Gomes;Claudia Lage Rebello da Motta;Adriano Joaquim de Oliveira Cruz
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 58-68
149 views DOI Abstract
2016
editorial
;Carlos Amaral Hölbig
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. -
145 views DOI Abstract
2016
hermes: um modelo para acessibilidade ubíqua dedicado à deficiência auditiva
;Carlos Felipe Rocha Carneiro;Jorge Luís Victória Barbosa
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 19-33
141 views DOI Abstract
View All 11 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.