clinical and translational medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#810 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

clinical and translational medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name clin transl med
Abbreviated Name clinical and translational medicine
ISSN 2001-1326
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/20011326
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2018
Extracellular vesicles as circulating cancer biomarkers: opportunities and challenges
Lane, R. E.;Korbie, D.;Hill, M. M.;Trau, M.;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
343 views Abstract
2017
new approaches to obtaining scientific innovation in morphological studies of bladder transitional epithelium
;O Popadynets;O Yurakh;N Tokaruk;T Kotyk;I Pukach;H Yurakh;M Osypchuk;N Dubyna;A Dmytrenko
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
285 views DOI Abstract
2020
Can routine laboratory tests discriminate SARS-CoV-2-infected pneumonia from other causes of community-acquired pneumonia?
Pan, Yunbao;Ye, Guangming;Zeng, Xiantao;Liu, Guohong;Zeng, Xiaojiao;Jiang, Xianghu;Zhao, Jin;Chen, Liangjun;Guo, Shuang;Deng, Qiaoling;Hong, Xiaoyue;Yang, Ying;Li, Yirong;Wang, Xinghuan;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 161-168
275 views DOI Abstract
2017
clinical effectiveness of using aesthetic fixed prosthetic appliances with combined occlusal surface
;Andrii Biben;Zinovii Ozhohan
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
275 views DOI Abstract
2018
endometriosis: a clinical enigma
;Emmanuel Igho Odokuma;H O Abedi;E A Onohwakpor
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. -
263 views DOI Abstract
2018
system of educational process organization at the department of endocrinology and the department of internal medicine no 1, immunopathology and allergology named after academician neiko ye.m. of ivano-frankivsk national medical university
;Oksana Didushko;Petro Herych;Iryna Cherniavska
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. -
244 views DOI Abstract
2017
features of histological forms of tumor growth in patients who underwent combined surgery for stomach cancer
;Yuriy Oliynyk;Roman Slipetsky
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. E201719-E201719
232 views DOI Abstract
2016
clinical case of tracheobronchopathia osteochondroplastica
;Nataliia V. Chaplynska;Mykola M. Bagrii;Victoriia T. Rudnyk;Mariana Y. Koniuska;Svitlana L. Filipova;Liubomyra O. Yacenta
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. E201641-E201641
216 views DOI Abstract
2016
peculiarities of biomechanical properties of ocular tissue in keratoconus
;Iryna Shargorodska
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. E2016421-E2016421
211 views DOI Abstract
2017
clinical aspects of combination of ceramic and acrylic occlusal surfaces
;Z. Ozhohan;Andrii Biben
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. E201718-E201718
206 views DOI Abstract
View All 11 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.