Indexed in Journament

Oncology Research and Treatment

ISSN 2296-5262· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.9/100
Journament Score
#9,935
Journament Rank
13
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Oncology Research and Treatment
Abbreviated Name oncol res treat
ISSN 2296-5262
URL http://www.karger.com?issn=2296-5262

Indexings

ulakbim

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2019
Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Differences between Three Different Age Groups (Child/Adolescent, Young Adults, and Adults) of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicentre Study.
, pp. 1-7
363 views DOI Abstract
2017
radioterapia e hipertermia no tratamento de recidivas locorregionais: primeiros casos tratados em portugal
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. -
247 views Abstract
2017
lesões Ósseas de novo: quando a origem não é a mais evidente
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. -
230 views Abstract
2018
sclerotic fibroma: a differential diagnosis of spontaneous keloid
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. -
227 views DOI Abstract
2017
síndrome demencial como fator de risco para penfigoide bolhoso
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. -
166 views Abstract
2017
lúpus eritematoso sistémico e hepatite autoimune: a propósito de um caso clínico
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. -
155 views Abstract
2018
síndrome antifosfolipídica: uma revisão a propósito de três casos clínicos
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. -
153 views DOI Abstract
2017
gliomatose cerebral: caso clínico e revisão da literatura
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. -
130 views Abstract
2017
corações “fora do prazo”: dois casos de amiloidose al
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. -
125 views Abstract
2016
depressão psicótica no idoso: desafio diagnóstico e papel da eletroconvulsivoterapia
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. -
115 views Abstract
2019
Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Differences between Three Different Age Groups (Child/Adolescent, Young Adults, and Adults) of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicentre Study.
, pp. 1-7
363 views DOI Abstract
2018
síndrome antifosfolipídica: uma revisão a propósito de três casos clínicos
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. -
153 views DOI Abstract
2018
sclerotic fibroma: a differential diagnosis of spontaneous keloid
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. -
227 views DOI Abstract
2017
lesões Ósseas de novo: quando a origem não é a mais evidente
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. -
230 views Abstract
2017
múltiplas recidivas oligometastáticas em doente com tumor de pulmão não-pequenas células
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. -
63 views Abstract
2017
metastização ganglionar de tumor de merkel de localização primária indeterminada: um caso clínico raro
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. -
14 views Abstract
2017
lúpus eritematoso sistémico e hepatite autoimune: a propósito de um caso clínico
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. -
155 views Abstract
2017
corações “fora do prazo”: dois casos de amiloidose al
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. -
125 views Abstract
2017
gliomatose cerebral: caso clínico e revisão da literatura
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. -
130 views Abstract
2017
radioterapia e hipertermia no tratamento de recidivas locorregionais: primeiros casos tratados em portugal
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. -
247 views Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.