Indexed in Journament

elementa: science of the anthropocene

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,887 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
27 Articles
Scores higher than 79.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name elementa: science of the anthropocene
Abbreviated Name elementa: science of the anthropocene

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 12.1
Content Distribution 62.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for elementa: science of the anthropocene
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 12.1 5.8
Content Distribution 62.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

2011
burocracia como organizaÇÃo, poder e controle
Vol. 51 , No. 5 , pp. 424-439
442 views Abstract
2019
In situ growth of deep-sea octocorals after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. -
434 views Abstract
2017
Field measurements and modeling to resolve m2 to km2 CH4 emissions for a complex urban source: An Indiana landfill study
Vol. 5 , pp. -
433 views Abstract
2015
Habitat eradication and cropland intensification may reduce parasitoid diversity and natural pest control services in annual crop fields
, pp. -
386 views Abstract
2014
como gestores hospitalares utilizam indicadores de desempenho?
Vol. 54 , No. 5 , pp. 496-509
364 views Abstract
2018
From technology transfer to innovation-based rural development: A necessary turn at the Indio Hatuey experimental station
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. -
356 views Abstract
2013
personalidade e boca a boca: propensÃo ao envio e recebimento de informaÇÕes
Vol. 53 , No. 6 , pp. 580-591
335 views Abstract
2016
reflexÕes sobre gestÃo de operaÇÕes: estado da arte e algumas contribuiÇÕes do brasil
Vol. 56 , No. 5 , pp. 468-472
332 views Abstract
2013
micropolÍticas das prÁticas cotidianas: etnografando uma organizaÇÃo circense
Vol. 53 , No. 2 , pp. 156-168
330 views Abstract
2019
In situ growth of deep-sea octocorals after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. -
434 views Abstract
2018
process-based modelling of the information systems resistance phenomenon
Vol. 58 , No. 1 , pp. 60-73
219 views Abstract
2018
From technology transfer to innovation-based rural development: A necessary turn at the Indio Hatuey experimental station
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. -
356 views Abstract
2017
building collaboration? co-location and “dis-location” in a railway control post
Vol. 57 , No. 6 , pp. 542-554
146 views Abstract
2017
Field measurements and modeling to resolve m2 to km2 CH4 emissions for a complex urban source: An Indiana landfill study
Vol. 5 , pp. -
433 views Abstract
2016
green microfinance: a new frontier to inclusive financial services
Vol. 56 , No. 2 , pp. 242-250
131 views Abstract
2016
reflexÕes sobre gestÃo de operaÇÕes: estado da arte e algumas contribuiÇÕes do brasil
Vol. 56 , No. 5 , pp. 468-472
332 views Abstract
2015
a joint experimental analysis of investor behavior in ipo pricing methods
Vol. 55 , No. 1 , pp. 14-25
150 views Abstract
2015
percepÇÃo da presenÇa dos outros consumidores e sua relaÇÃo com emoÇÕes e valor hedÔnico de compra
Vol. 55 , No. 6 , pp. 712-723
165 views Abstract
Journament Score
36.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,887 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.