Indexed in Journament

environment, development and sustainability

ISSN 1573-2975· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,320 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
22 Articles
Scores higher than 61.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name environ dev sustain
Abbreviated Name environment, development and sustainability
ISSN 1573-2975
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/10668

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 43.3 26.3
Innovation 40.5 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 4.3
Content Distribution 79.2 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (22)

1970
Remote Sensing and GIS Technologies as Tools to Support Sustainable Management of Areas Devastated by Landslides
Noemi De La Ville;Alejandro Chumaceiro Diaz;Denisse Ramirez;Noemi De La Ville;Alejandro Chumaceiro Diaz;Denisse Ramirez;
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 221-229
370 views DOI Abstract
2016
optimization of dental implant treatment
;Dmitriy V. Ivanov;Aleksandr V. Dol;Dmitriy A. Smirnov
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. e0102-
351 views DOI Abstract
2018
efficiency evaluation of quadratic inference functions in the analysis of longitudinal medical data
;Jamshid Yazdani-Charati;Maryam Tatari;Hamed Rouhanizade
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. e0310-
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Trajectory analysis of agricultural lands occupation and its decoupling relationships with the growth rate of non-agricultural GDP in the Jing-Jin-Tang region, China
Wang, D.
Vol. 21 , pp. 799-815
329 views DOI
2019
Use of discrete choice experiments to facilitate design of effective environmentally friendly agricultural policies
Wang, N.
Vol. 21 , pp. 1543-1559
328 views DOI
2013
prescribing pattern of antidepressant drugs among general practitioners and psychiatrists: a study from iran
;Hamid Reza Motevallyzadeh;Mohammad Reza Baneshi;Maryam Rameshk;Nouzar Nakhaee
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 0205-
319 views Abstract
2019
Visitor’s perceptions of the Forest Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM) as an urban open space for environmental learning: results of a qualitative study
Dreyer, J.
Vol. 21 , pp. 1933-1945
315 views DOI
2017
optimal coronary artery bypass graft timing in high-risk acute myocardial infarction with st elevation
;Sasko Jovev;Slavica Mitrovska;Suzana Dameska;Nikola Lazovski;Mishel Andov;Alexandar Kolev;Vangel Zdraveski;Omer Dzemali
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. e0206-
307 views DOI Abstract
2013
accumulation and biodistribution of gold nanoparticles in the mesenteric lymph nodes at oral administration
;Olga V. Zlobina;Svetlana S. Pakhomiy;Alla B. Bucharskaya;Irina O. Bugaeva;Galina N. Maslyakova;Nikolai G. Khlebtsov;Boris N. Khlebtsov;Vladimir A. Bogatyrev
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 0301-
294 views Abstract
2020
How COVID 19 effect Malaysian paddy industry? Adoption of green fertilizer a potential resolution.
Adnan, Nadia;Nordin, Shahrina Md;
, pp. 1-41
287 views DOI Abstract
2020
A time series analysis of causality between tourist arrivals and climatic effects for nature-based tourism destinations: evidence from Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
Baig, S.
, pp. 0-0
224 views DOI
2020
How COVID 19 effect Malaysian paddy industry? Adoption of green fertilizer a potential resolution.
Adnan, Nadia;Nordin, Shahrina Md;
, pp. 1-41
287 views DOI Abstract
2020
Enhancing sustainable sanitation through capacity building and rural sanitation marketing in Malawi
Kasulo, V.
Vol. 22 , pp. 201-215
250 views DOI
2019
Applying fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS technique in identifying the content strategy of sustainable manufacturing for food production
Ocampo, L.
Vol. 21 , pp. 2225-2251
219 views DOI
2019
Correction to: Applying fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS technique in identifying the content strategy of sustainable manufacturing for food production (Environment, Development and Sustainability, (2019), 21, 5, (2225-2251), 10.1007/s10668-018-0129-8)
Ocampo, L.
Vol. 21 , pp. 3121-3122
213 views DOI
2019
Trajectory analysis of agricultural lands occupation and its decoupling relationships with the growth rate of non-agricultural GDP in the Jing-Jin-Tang region, China
Wang, D.
Vol. 21 , pp. 799-815
329 views DOI
2019
Does industrial relocation alleviate environmental pollution? A mathematical economics analysis
Li, M.
, pp. 0-0
178 views DOI
2019
Factors influencing the livelihoods of ecological migrants in coal mined-out areas in China
Xue, Y.
Vol. 21 , pp. 1853-1867
245 views DOI
2019
Examining the role of organic production schemes in Mediterranean pastoralism
López-i-Gelats, F.
, pp. 0-0
210 views DOI
2019
Visitor’s perceptions of the Forest Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM) as an urban open space for environmental learning: results of a qualitative study
Dreyer, J.
Vol. 21 , pp. 1933-1945
315 views DOI
Journament Score
33.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,320 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

43.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

79.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.