Indexed in Journament

tema: journal of land use, mobility and environment

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,977 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 62.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name tema: journal of land use, mobility and environment
Abbreviated Name tema: journal of land use, mobility and environment

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 60.0
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 71.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for tema: journal of land use, mobility and environment
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 60.0 27.4
Community Impact 8.6 7.8
Content Distribution 71.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2012
Walking (and cycling) to change the city Camminare (e pedalare) per trasformare la città
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 99-108
451 views Abstract
2018
A Set of Variables for the Elderly Accessibility in Urban Areas
, pp. 53-66
449 views Abstract
2013
Resources and Energy Management: the case of the Agropoli Urban Plan
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 145-158
401 views Abstract
2010
Tre ipotesi di pedonalizzazione facilitata tra Posillipo e Marechiaro
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. -
400 views Abstract
2011
Buildings Indicators for Sustainable Mobility: the District of Naples
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. -
375 views Abstract
2012
Spatial Resilience of Outdoor Domestic Space in Mozambique
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 131-146
360 views Abstract
2018
The Value of Urban Density
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 213-230
338 views Abstract
2015
Editorial Preface. Cities, Energy and Climate Change
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 3-4
308 views
2014
Mapping Smart Regions. An Exploratory Approach
, pp. -
277 views Abstract
2018
A Set of Variables for the Elderly Accessibility in Urban Areas
, pp. 53-66
449 views Abstract
2018
The Value of Urban Density
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 213-230
338 views Abstract
2017
input pelaksanaan kangaroo mother care pada berat lahir rendah di rumah sakit
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 42-50
167 views Abstract
2017
hubungan status sosial ekonomi dengan perkembangan batita
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. -
180 views Abstract
2017
analisis faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan kejadian abortus pada karyawati
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. -
164 views Abstract
2016
hubungan konseling terhadap pengambilan keputusan kesertaan keluarga berencana dalam perspektif ham di kota yogyakarta
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
152 views Abstract
2016
efektifitas pijat punggung menggunakan minyak esensial lavender terhadap produksi asi ibu pasca salin
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 29-37
185 views Abstract
2015
Editorial Preface. Cities, Energy and Climate Change
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 3-4
308 views
Journament Score
35.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,977 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

60.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.