Indexed in Journament

intensive care medicine

ISSN 1432-1238· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,092 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
30 Articles
Scores higher than 41.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name intensive care med
Abbreviated Name intensive care med
ISSN 1432-1238
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/134

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for intensive care medicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 11.1 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 5.7 7.8
Content Distribution 77.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2002
Seven cases of fungemia with Saccharomyces boulardii in critically ill patients
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 797-801
597 views DOI Abstract
2015
Strategies to reduce curative antibiotic therapy in intensive care units (adult and paediatric)
Vol. 41 , No. 7 , pp. -
422 views Abstract
2010
Critical care management of patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
Vol. 36 , No. 10 , pp. -
415 views Abstract
2015
Failure of high-flow nasal cannula therapy may delay intubation and increase mortality
Vol. 41 , No. 4 , pp. 623-632
406 views DOI Abstract
2010
Critical care management of patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
Vol. 36 , No. 10 , pp. 1695-1702
395 views DOI Abstract
2014
Predictors of insufficient amikacin peak concentration in critically ill patients receiving a 25 mg/kg total body weight regimen
Vol. 40 , No. 7 , pp. -
394 views Abstract
2002
Seven cases of fungemia with Saccharomyces boulardii in critically ill patients
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. -
384 views Abstract
2020
Ethical climate and intention to leave among critical care clinicians: an observational study in 68 intensive care units across Europe and the United States.
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 46-56
379 views DOI Abstract
2016
Assessment of heart rate, acidosis, consciousness, oxygenation, and respiratory rate to predict noninvasive ventilation failure in hypoxemic patients - Intensive Care Medicine
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 192-199
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
Diagnosis of severe respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients
Vol. 46 , No. 2 , pp. 298-314
288 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ethical climate and intention to leave among critical care clinicians: an observational study in 68 intensive care units across Europe and the United States.
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 46-56
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. -
302 views Abstract
2019
Analysis of the medical response to November 2015 Paris terrorist attacks: resource utilization according to the cause of injury.
264 views DOI Abstract
2018
2018
enhanced big data platform for visualization of employee data.
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 169-174
277 views DOI Abstract
2018
application of genetic algorithm and personal informatics in stock market
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 68-72
329 views DOI Abstract
2018
optimization of digital image processing method to improve smoke opacity meter accuracy
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 88-91
231 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,092 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.