Indexed in Journament

intensive care medicine

ISSN 1432-1238· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.0/100
Journament Score
#941
Journament Rank
30
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name intensive care med
Abbreviated Name intensive care med
ISSN 1432-1238
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/134

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2002
Seven cases of fungemia with Saccharomyces boulardii in critically ill patients
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 797-801
506 views DOI Abstract
2010
Critical care management of patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
Vol. 36 , No. 10 , pp. -
390 views Abstract
2015
Strategies to reduce curative antibiotic therapy in intensive care units (adult and paediatric)
Vol. 41 , No. 7 , pp. -
377 views Abstract
2015
Failure of high-flow nasal cannula therapy may delay intubation and increase mortality
Vol. 41 , No. 4 , pp. 623-632
368 views DOI Abstract
1970
Autonomic control of the heart and peripheral vessels in human septic shock - Intensive Care Medicine
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 112-119
352 views DOI Abstract
2014
Predictors of insufficient amikacin peak concentration in critically ill patients receiving a 25 mg/kg total body weight regimen
Vol. 40 , No. 7 , pp. -
351 views Abstract
2002
Seven cases of fungemia with Saccharomyces boulardii in critically ill patients
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. -
351 views Abstract
2010
Critical care management of patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
Vol. 36 , No. 10 , pp. 1695-1702
348 views DOI Abstract
2016
Assessment of heart rate, acidosis, consciousness, oxygenation, and respiratory rate to predict noninvasive ventilation failure in hypoxemic patients - Intensive Care Medicine
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 192-199
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
Diagnosis of severe respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients
Vol. 46 , No. 2 , pp. 298-314
267 views DOI Abstract
2020
Ethical climate and intention to leave among critical care clinicians: an observational study in 68 intensive care units across Europe and the United States.
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 46-56
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vol. 45 , No. 5 , pp. -
257 views Abstract
2019
Analysis of the medical response to November 2015 Paris terrorist attacks: resource utilization according to the cause of injury.
245 views DOI Abstract
2018
2018
enhanced big data platform for visualization of employee data.
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 169-174
251 views DOI Abstract
2018
application of genetic algorithm and personal informatics in stock market
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 68-72
301 views DOI Abstract
2018
optimization of digital image processing method to improve smoke opacity meter accuracy
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 88-91
205 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

43.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.