High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clicks: 303
ID: 274411
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #16 of 30 articles by views in intensive care medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, HFNC may decrease the need for tracheal intubation without impacting mortality.
Reference Key
b2019intensivehigh Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Rochwerg B;Granton D;Wang DX;Helviz Y;Einav S;Frat JP;Mekontso-Dessap A;Schreiber A;Azoulay E;Mercat A;Demoule A;Lemiale V;Pesenti A;Riviello ED;Mauri T;Mancebo J;Brochard L;Burns K;;
Journal intensive care medicine
Year 2019
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.