Indexed in Journament

european journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the european association for cardio-thoracic surgery

ISSN 1873-734X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,701 of 29,303 scored journals (34,041 indexed)
62 Articles
Scores higher than 36.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eur j cardiothorac surg
Abbreviated Name eur j cardiothorac surg
ISSN 1873-734X
URL http://ejcts.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.6
Accessibility 20.0 23.5
Timeliness 90.0 3.1
Diversity 5.6 25.9
Innovation 33.0 24.1
Community Impact 6.4 6.9
Content Distribution 23.2 89.9
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (62)

2019
Unifocalization cannot rely exclusively on native pulmonary arteries: the importance of recruitment of major aortopulmonary collaterals in 249 cases†.
Barron, David J;Kutty, Ramesh S;Stickley, John;Stümper, Oliver;Botha, Phil;Khan, Natasha E;Jones, Timothy J;Drury, Nigel E;Brawn, William J;
457 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tetralogy of Fallot and abnormal coronary artery: use of a prosthetic conduit is outdated.
Pontailler, Margaux;Bernard, Chloé;Gaudin, Régis;Moreau de Bellaing, Anne;Mostefa Kara, Mansour;Haydar, Ayman;Barbanti, Claudio;Bonnet, Damien;Vouhé, Pascal;Raisky, Olivier;
Vol. 56 , No. 1 , pp. 94-100
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of non-respect of SYNTAX score II recommendation for surgery in patients with left main coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: an EXCEL substudy.
Modolo, Rodrigo;Chichareon, Ply;van Klaveren, David;Dressler, Ovidiu;Zhang, Yiran;Sabik, Joseph F;Onuma, Yoshinobu;Kappetein, Arie Pieter;Stone, Gregg W;Serruys, Patrick W;
429 views DOI Abstract
2019
Elastomeric cardiopatch scaffold for myocardial repair and ventricular support.
Chachques, Juan Carlos;Lila, Nermine;Soler-Botija, Carolina;Martinez-Ramos, Cristina;Valles, Ana;Autret, Gwennhael;Perier, Marie-Cecile;Mirochnik, Nicolas;Monleon-Pradas, Manuel;Bayes-Genis, Antoni;Semino, Carlos E;
416 views DOI Abstract
2008
designing semiconductor heterostructures with python
;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. -
338 views Abstract
2010
python for collective intelligence and collaborative filtering
;
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. -
322 views Abstract
2008
letters to the python papers
;
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 14-17
301 views
2008
embedding a python interpreter into your program
;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. -
284 views
2026
Artificial Pancreas and Continuous Insulin Infusion for Preventing Cardiac Surgical Site Infections
Takeshi Arai, Daichi Takagi, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Nakajima
154 views DOI
2018
Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)
Tim Batchelor, Neil Rasburn, Etienne Abdelnour‐Berchtold, Alessandro Brunelli, Robert J. Cerfolio, Michel González, Olle Ljungqvist, René Horsleben Petersen, Wanda M. Popescu, Peter Slinger, Babu Naidu
92 views DOI Abstract
2026
A wire on fire: the Vienna experience on dividing the membrane in acute and chronic dissections using electrosurgical septotomy
Florian Schoenhoff
7 views DOI
2026
David Paul Taggart (1958-2026): In MemoriamSurgeon-scientist, patient advocate, and friend
John D. Puskas, Marcus D Flather
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Three Decades of Paediatric Heart Transplantation: Long-term Outcomes and the Evolving Role of Mechanical Circulatory Support
Mohamed Salem, Taha Al-Sharaeai, Moustafa Marach-Housarieh, Susanne Skrzypek, Martin Leroy, David Backhoff, Joseph Thul, Christian Jux, Matthias Müller, Hakan Akintürk
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Standstill in Cardioplegia: Have We Reached the Peak of Myocardial Protection?
Dwight Harris, Sharif A. Sabe, Frank William Sellke
9 views DOI
2026
Coronary Dominance and Variations in Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
Muhammad Umar Nasir, Riccardo Panevino, Louis B. Louis, Chethu Sarathi Kalaivani Gobalakrishnan, Juliane K. Vierecke, Vlad Cotarlan, Antonio Panza, Samuel R. Vester, Kukbin Choi, Asishana Avo Osho, David A. D’Alessandro, Cristiano Spadaccio
14 views DOI
2026
What Are the Survival Outcomes of Patients Requiring Postcardiotomy Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support?
Silvia Mariani, Udo Boeken
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Electrosurgical septotomy across the full spectrum of aortic dissection
Gabriel Weiss, Hubert Trnka, Sebastian Tauber, Emely Manville, Zsuzsanna Arnold, Bernhard Michael Winkler, Sandra Folkmann, Martin Grabenwöger
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
Reinventing coronary bypass surgery: A journey
John Puskas
20 views DOI
2026
Tricuspid regurgitation: choosing the right treatment for the right patient at the right time
Benedetto Del Forno, Francesco Maisano, Ottavio Alfieri
20 views DOI Abstract
2026
Lung volume reduction surgery in emphysema with severely impaired 6-minute walk distance
Jacopo Saccomanno, Aron Elsner, Thomas Sgarbossa, Stefan Welter, Marc Hinterthaner, Stephan Eisenmann, Bernd Schmidt, Wolfgang Gesierich, Nicolas Johannes Dickgreber, Christian Geltner, Joachim Hans Ficker, Angélique Holland, Björn Schwick, Stephan Eggeling, Klaus‐Dieter Diemel, Christian Grah, Carl Hünermann, Urte Sommerwerck, Andreas Fertl, Sylke Kurz, Peter Schramm, Joanna Krist, Martin Witzenrath, Jens Carsten Rückert, Ralf‐Harto Hübner
26 views DOI
Journament Score
29.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,701 of 29,303 scored
(34,041 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

33.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

23.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.