Indexed in Journament

european journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the european association for cardio-thoracic surgery

ISSN 1873-734X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.8/100
Journament Score
#1,318
Journament Rank
37
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name eur j cardiothorac surg
Abbreviated Name eur j cardiothorac surg
ISSN 1873-734X
URL http://ejcts.oxfordjournals.org

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (37)

2019
Unifocalization cannot rely exclusively on native pulmonary arteries: the importance of recruitment of major aortopulmonary collaterals in 249 cases†.
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tetralogy of Fallot and abnormal coronary artery: use of a prosthetic conduit is outdated.
Vol. 56 , No. 1 , pp. 94-100
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of non-respect of SYNTAX score II recommendation for surgery in patients with left main coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: an EXCEL substudy.
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Elastomeric cardiopatch scaffold for myocardial repair and ventricular support.
348 views DOI Abstract
2008
designing semiconductor heterostructures with python
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. -
290 views Abstract
2010
python for collective intelligence and collaborative filtering
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. -
267 views Abstract
2008
letters to the python papers
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 14-17
237 views
2008
embedding a python interpreter into your program
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. -
224 views
2018
Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)
47 views DOI Abstract
2018
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
40 views DOI
2026
The long-term impact of a teleprehabilitation program on modifiable risk factors and quality of life after cardiac surgery
DOI Abstract
2026
Current Status of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Surgery
2 views DOI
2026
Anti-thrombotic therapy after mitral valve surgery
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Intercostal nerve cryoablation versus thoracic epidural analgesia for minimal invasive repair of pectus excavatum: a randomized clinical trial (ICE-trial)
DOI Abstract
2026
The role of selective multidetector computed tomography after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
My journey of internal thoracic artery grafting
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Mitral valve anomalies in transposition of the great arteries
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Association between interventional cardiologist practice characteristics, CABG use, and clinical outcomes
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Artificial Pancreas and Continuous Insulin Infusion for Preventing Cardiac Surgical Site Infections
9 views DOI
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
85
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

85.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.