Indexed in Journament

medical hypotheses

ISSN 1532-2777· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,565 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
72 Articles
Scores higher than 40% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name med hypotheses
Abbreviated Name medical hypotheses
ISSN 1532-2777
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/623059/description#description

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for medical hypotheses
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 11.4 4.2
Content Distribution 70.5 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (72)

2020
Hereditary acromegalic gigantism in the family of Roman Emperor Maximinus Thrax.
Vol. 136 , pp. 109525
613 views DOI
2020
Vitamin D: A simpler alternative to tocilizumab for trial in COVID-19?
Vol. 140 , pp. 109767
546 views DOI Abstract
2020
Inhibitory potential of plant secondary metabolites on anti-Parkinsonian drug targets: Relevance to pathophysiology, and motor and non-motor behavioural abnormalities.
Vol. 137 , pp. 109544
528 views DOI Abstract
2019
The possible synergistic action of sex hormones and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists on body mass decline in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Vol. 131 , pp. 109308
451 views DOI Abstract
2020
Oral cancer and periodontal disease increase the risk of COVID 19? A mechanism mediated through furin and cathepsin overexpression.
Vol. 144 , pp. 109936
437 views DOI
2021
Early multidrug treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) and reduced mortality among nursing home (or outpatient/ambulatory) residents
Vol. 153 , pp. -
283 views Abstract
2020
Neural implant for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.
Vol. 145 , pp. 110324
215 views DOI Abstract
2020
WHO statement - "Older people are at highest risk from COVID-19": Should the hypothesis be corroborated or rejected?
Vol. 144 , pp. 109896
330 views DOI Abstract
2020
Is hesperidin essential for prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 Infection?
Vol. 144 , pp. 109957
246 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
COVID-19: Loss of bridging between innate and adaptive immunity?
Vol. 144 , pp. 109861
335 views DOI Abstract
2020
Could autism spectrum disorders be a risk factor for COVID-19?
Vol. 144 , pp. 109899
230 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 infection: Is the outcome time-dependent?
Vol. 144 , pp. 109902
294 views DOI
2020
Hydrogen peroxide and viral infections: A literature review with research hypothesis definition in relation to the current covid-19 pandemic.
Vol. 144 , pp. 109910
278 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,565 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

30.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.