journal of retailing and consumer services | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4974 / 33,982
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

journal of retailing and consumer services

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim soc
Short Name journal of retailing and consumer services
Abbreviated Name journal of retailing and consumer services
ISSN 0969-6989
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (70 total)

2020
Smartphone preferences and brand loyalty: A discrete choice model reflecting the reference point and peer effect
Kim, J.
Vol. 52 , pp. 0-0
451 views DOI
2020
Second-hand shopping and brand loyalty: The role of online collaborative redistribution platforms
Abbes, I.
Vol. 52 , pp. 0-0
427 views DOI
2020
When luxury brands meet China: The effect of localized celebrity endorsements in social media marketing
Yu, S.
Vol. 54 , pp. 0-0
419 views DOI
2019
Why do people use food delivery apps (FDA)? A uses and gratification theory perspective
Ray, A.
Vol. 51 , pp. 221-230
416 views DOI
2020
How consumers form product quality perceptions in absence of fixed posted prices: Interaction of product cues with seller reputation and third-party reviews
Narwal, P.
Vol. 52 , pp. 0-0
347 views DOI
2016
the end of the prohibition era: questions about injustice, effectiveness of laws and legalization of drugs
;Hilbert Reis Silva
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 154-170
335 views DOI Abstract
2020
Feelings of ownership and volunteering: Examining psychological ownership as a volunteering motivation for nonprofit service organisations
Ainsworth, J.
Vol. 52 , pp. 0-0
327 views DOI
2017
Health and cosmetics: Investigating consumers’ values for buying organic personal care products
Ghazali, E.
Vol. 39 , pp. 154-163
325 views DOI
2019
Motivations for customer revisit behavior in online review comments: Analyzing the role of user experience using big data approaches
Park, E.
Vol. 51 , pp. 14-18
308 views DOI
2020
Visual attention to the main image of a hotel website based on its position, type of navigation and belonging to Millennial generation: An eye tracking study
Espigares-Jurado, F.
Vol. 52 , pp. 0-0
306 views DOI
View All 70 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.