Indexed in Journament

scandinavian journal of occupational therapy

ISSN 1651-2014· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,080 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
19 Articles
Scores higher than 65.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name scand j occup ther
Abbreviated Name scandinavian journal of occupational therapy
ISSN 1651-2014
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/iocc20/current

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 66.7 26.4
Innovation 36.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 4.4
Content Distribution 64.5 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2019
Vocational support in mental health service delivery in Australia
Petrakis, M.
Vol. 26 , pp. 535-545
462 views DOI
2020
The perceived challenge of everyday technologies in Sweden, the United States and England: Exploring differential item functioning in the everyday technology use questionnaire.
Wallcook, Sarah;Malinowsky, Camilla;Nygård, Louise;Charlesworth, Georgina;Lee, Jenica;Walsh, Ryan;Gaber, Sophie;Kottorp, Anders;
, pp. 1-13
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
Experiences of meaning in garden therapy in outpatient psychiatric care in Sweden. A narrative study.
Wästberg, Birgitta A;Harris, Ulrika;Gunnarsson, A Birgitta;
, pp. 1-11
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Norwegian Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-N)–development and pilot study
Uhrmann, L.
Vol. 26 , pp. 546-551
351 views DOI
2019
Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals
Brown, T.
Vol. 26 , pp. 475-483
346 views DOI
2017
Preventive behaviour at work - A concept analysis.
Lecours, Alexandra;Therriault, Pierre-Yves;
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 249-258
319 views DOI Abstract
2016
educação de jovens e adultos: modalidade de ensino e direito educacional
;Valdivina Alves Ferreira;Marcilene Ferreira Rodrigues
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 571-583
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mining concepts of health responsibility using text mining and exploratory graph analysis
Kjellström, S.
Vol. 26 , pp. 395-410
293 views DOI
2016
evaluating higher education institutions through agency and resources-capabilities theories. a model for measuring the perceived quality of service
;José Guadalupe Vargas-hernández
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 393-420
291 views DOI Abstract
2017
documentos de política científica e educacional: convergências em torno da educação básica
;Adriano de Oliveira;Lucídio Bianchetti
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 151-166
276 views DOI Abstract
2020
The perceived challenge of everyday technologies in Sweden, the United States and England: Exploring differential item functioning in the everyday technology use questionnaire.
Wallcook, Sarah;Malinowsky, Camilla;Nygård, Louise;Charlesworth, Georgina;Lee, Jenica;Walsh, Ryan;Gaber, Sophie;Kottorp, Anders;
, pp. 1-13
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
Experiences of meaning in garden therapy in outpatient psychiatric care in Sweden. A narrative study.
Wästberg, Birgitta A;Harris, Ulrika;Gunnarsson, A Birgitta;
, pp. 1-11
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals
Brown, T.
Vol. 26 , pp. 475-483
346 views DOI
2019
Mining concepts of health responsibility using text mining and exploratory graph analysis
Kjellström, S.
Vol. 26 , pp. 395-410
293 views DOI
2019
The Norwegian Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-N)–development and pilot study
Uhrmann, L.
Vol. 26 , pp. 546-551
351 views DOI
2019
Vocational support in mental health service delivery in Australia
Petrakis, M.
Vol. 26 , pp. 535-545
462 views DOI
2018
capacidades do estado brasileiro e arquitetura institucional da ead: da organização burocrática à autonomia inserida dos órgãos estatais
;Daniela da Costa Britto Pereira Lima;Mônica Desiderio
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. 121-142
186 views DOI Abstract
2018
regulação/avaliação da educação superior a distância: multiplicidade de atores institucionais, labirinto de atos oficiais e avaliação regulatória
;Stella Cecilia Duarte Segenreich
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. 99-119
210 views DOI Abstract
2018
mapeamento das tendências de investigação em educação a distância e elearning, na década 2004-2013: estudo exploratório no contexto português
;Lina Morgado;Angelina Costa
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. 53-71
197 views DOI Abstract
2017
visões de diretoras de escola sobre políticas públicas e determinações legais educacionais
;Celso Luiz Aparecido Conti;Emília Freitas de Lima;Renata Maria Moschen Nascente
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 771-790
49 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,080 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

36.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.