scandinavian journal of occupational therapy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1101 / 33,954
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

scandinavian journal of occupational therapy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name scand j occup ther
Abbreviated Name scandinavian journal of occupational therapy
ISSN 1651-2014
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/iocc20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2019
Vocational support in mental health service delivery in Australia
Petrakis, M.
Vol. 26 , pp. 535-545
397 views DOI
2020
The perceived challenge of everyday technologies in Sweden, the United States and England: Exploring differential item functioning in the everyday technology use questionnaire.
Wallcook, Sarah;Malinowsky, Camilla;Nygård, Louise;Charlesworth, Georgina;Lee, Jenica;Walsh, Ryan;Gaber, Sophie;Kottorp, Anders;
, pp. 1-13
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals
Brown, T.
Vol. 26 , pp. 475-483
291 views DOI
2020
Experiences of meaning in garden therapy in outpatient psychiatric care in Sweden. A narrative study.
Wästberg, Birgitta A;Harris, Ulrika;Gunnarsson, A Birgitta;
, pp. 1-11
284 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Norwegian Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-N)–development and pilot study
Uhrmann, L.
Vol. 26 , pp. 546-551
276 views DOI
2017
Preventive behaviour at work - A concept analysis.
Lecours, Alexandra;Therriault, Pierre-Yves;
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 249-258
242 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mining concepts of health responsibility using text mining and exploratory graph analysis
Kjellström, S.
Vol. 26 , pp. 395-410
236 views DOI
2016
educação de jovens e adultos: modalidade de ensino e direito educacional
;Valdivina Alves Ferreira;Marcilene Ferreira Rodrigues
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 571-583
229 views DOI Abstract
2016
evaluating higher education institutions through agency and resources-capabilities theories. a model for measuring the perceived quality of service
;José Guadalupe Vargas-hernández
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 393-420
222 views DOI Abstract
2017
documentos de política científica e educacional: convergências em torno da educação básica
;Adriano de Oliveira;Lucídio Bianchetti
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 151-166
207 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.