urology annals | Journament

Journal Ranking

#594 / 33,953
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

urology annals

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name urol ann
Abbreviated Name urol ann
ISSN 0974-7796
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.urologyannals.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

Peyronie's Disease is common in poorly controlled diabetics but is not associated with the Metabolic Syndrome.
Habous, Mohamad;Malkawi, Ibraheem;Han, Esther;Farag, Mohammed;Muir, Gordon;Abdelwahab, Osama;Nassar, Mohammed;Mahmoud, Saad;Santucci, Richard;Binsaleh, Saleh;
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 252-256
349 views DOI Abstract
Ureteral stricture after ureteroscopy for stones: A prospective study for the incidence and risk factors.
Darwish, Amr E;Gadelmoula, Mohamed M;Abdelkawi, Islam F;Abdellatif, Atef M;Abdel-Moneim, Ahmed M;Hammouda, Hisham M;
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 276-281
295 views DOI Abstract
Autologous buccal mucosa harvest under local anesthesia: Feasibility, safety, and acceptance for substitution urethroplasty.
Ajape, Abdulwahab Akanbi;Kuranga, Sulyman Alege;Kura, Mohammed Mustapha;Olanipekun, Hamid Babajide;
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 298-303
287 views DOI Abstract
2014
an unusual case of splenomegaly and increased lactate dehydrogenase heralding acute myeloid leukemia with eosinophilia and runx1–mecom fusion transcripts
;Fabio Forghieri;Sara Bigliardi;Monica Morselli;Leonardo Potenza;Valeria Fantuzzi;Laura Faglioni;Vincenzo Nasillo;Andrea Messerotti;Ambra Paolini;Mario Luppi
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 83-85
279 views DOI Abstract
2017
low body weight and body mass index may be associated with musculoskeletal pain following imatinib discontinuation in chronic myeloid leukemia
;Seiichiro Katagiri;Tetsuzo Tauchi;Keiko Ando;Seiichi Okabe;Moritaka Gotoh;Kazuma Ohyashiki
Vol. 7 , No. C , pp. 33-35
265 views DOI Abstract
2016
enhanced international prognostic index in japanese patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma
;Aya Nakaya;Shinya Fujita;Atsushi Satake;Takahisa Nakanishi;Yoshiko Azuma;Yukie Tsubokura;Masaaki Hotta;Hideaki Yoshimura;Kazuyoshi Ishii;Tomoki Ito;Shosaku Nomura
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 24-26
245 views DOI Abstract
2017
ibrutinib as a bridge to transplant in high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a case report and review of the literature
;Arcari Annalisa;Bassi Simona;Pochintesta Lara;Trabacchi Elena;Moroni Carlo Filippo;Rossi Angela;Zanlari Luca;Vallisa Daniele
Vol. 8 , No. C , pp. 21-23
229 views DOI Abstract
2017
tumor lysis syndrome (tls) following intrathecal chemotherapy in a child with acute myelogenous leukemia (aml)
;Chana L. Glasser, MD
Vol. 8 , No. C , pp. 19-20
216 views DOI Abstract
2015
an intensive approach to treatment for older patients with relapsed isolated npm1 mutated aml
;Srivasavi Dukka;David T. Bowen
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 18-20
215 views DOI Abstract
2015
Erectile Dysfunction
Vol. 7 , No. 6 , pp. 62-88
202 views
View All 15 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.