linux dev center, downloaded from http://www linuxdevcenter com/lpt/a/1636 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5183 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

linux dev center, downloaded from http://www linuxdevcenter com/lpt/a/1636

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name linux dev center, downloaded from http://www linuxdevcenter com/lpt/a/1636
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (23 total)

2013
development of oral sustained release rifampicin loaded chitosan nanoparticles by design of experiment
;Bhavin K. Patel;Rajesh H. Parikh;Pooja S. Aboti
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
409 views DOI Abstract
2012
design and characterization of a silk-fibroin-based drug delivery platform using naproxen as a model drug
;Tatyana Dyakonov;Chue Hue Yang;Derek Bush;Saujanya Gosangari;Shingai Majuru;Aqeel Fatmi
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
305 views DOI Abstract
2011
safety evaluation of exparel (depofoam bupivacaine) administered by repeated subcutaneous injection in rabbits and dogs: species comparison
;Brigitte M. Richard;Douglas E. Rickert;Paul E. Newton;Laura R. Ott;Dean Haan;Abram N. Brubaker;Phaedra I. Cole;Paul E. Ross;Marlon C. Rebelatto;Keith G. Nelson
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
264 views DOI Abstract
2017
targeted delivery of sirna therapeutics to malignant tumors
;Qixin Leng;Martin C. Woodle;A. James Mixson
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
252 views DOI Abstract
2011
liposomes for targeted delivery of active agents against neurodegenerative diseases (alzheimer's disease and parkinson's disease)
;Carlos Spuch;Carmen Navarro
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
252 views DOI Abstract
2012
development, characterization, and in vitro evaluation of tamoxifen microemulsions
;E. Monteagudo;Y. Gándola;L. González;C. Bregni;A. M. Carlucci
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
251 views DOI Abstract
2011
local gene delivery system by bubble liposomes and ultrasound exposure into joint synovium
;Yoichi Negishi;Yuka Tsunoda;Yoko Endo-Takahashi;Yusuke Oda;Ryo Suzuki;Kazuo Maruyama;Matsuo Yamamoto;Yukihiko Aramaki
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
246 views DOI Abstract
2011
cellular injury of cardiomyocytes during hepatocyte growth factor gene transfection with ultrasound-triggered bubble liposome destruction
;Kazuo Komamura;Rie Tatsumi;Yuko Tsujita-Kuroda;Takatoshi Onoe;Kunio Matsumoto;Toshikazu Nakamura;Jun-ichi Miyazaki;Takeshi Horio;Masaru Sugimachi
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
245 views DOI Abstract
2011
the use of radioactive marker as a tool to evaluate the drug release in plasma and particle biodistribution of block copolymer nanoparticles
;Sharon Johnstone;Steven Ansell;Sherwin Xie;Lawrence Mayer;Paul Tardi
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
242 views DOI Abstract
2014
preparation and the biopharmaceutical evaluation for the metered dose transdermal spray of dexketoprofen
;Wangding Lu;Huafei Luo;Zhuangzhi Zhu;Yubo Wu;Jing Luo;Hao Wang
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
237 views DOI Abstract
View All 23 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.