journal of archaeological science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3302 / 33,957
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of archaeological science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci ahci soc
Short Name journal of archaeological science
Abbreviated Name
ISSN 0305-4403
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-archaeological-science
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2016
Do fish remains provide reliable palaeoenvironmental records? An examination of the effects of cooking on the morphology and chemistry of fish otoliths, vertebrae and scales
Disspain M.
Vol. 74 , pp. 45-59
333 views DOI
2015
Cooking fish and drinking milk? Patterns in pottery use in the southeastern Baltic, 3300-2400 cal BC
Heron C.
Vol. 63 , pp. 33-43
268 views DOI
2014
the genre tutorial and social networks terminology
;Márcio Sales Santiago;Maria da Graça Krieger ;Júlio Araújo
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 381-402
260 views DOI Abstract
2007
noticiário -2006
;Ieda Maria Alves;Ana Rosa Ferreira Dias;Ataliba Teixeira de Castilho;Geraldo Cintra;Oswaldo Humberto Leonardi Ceschin;Heitor Megale
, No. 9 , pp. 405-438
235 views DOI
2011
researching changing language learning identities for ethnic minority education policy formulation: a case study of macau s.a.r., china
;Manuel Noronha;Ian Chaplin
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 409-440
209 views DOI Abstract
2015
from the radio to the classroom: a rhetorical-conversational analysis of the genre “spot”
;Maria Francisca Oliveira Santos;Maria Flávia Figueiredo
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 205-225
199 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prehistoric Chaco Canyon, New Mexico: Residential population implications of limited agricultural and mammal productivity
Benson, L.
Vol. 108 , pp. 0-0
168 views DOI
1997
o paradigma e a vivência: a busca da identidade
;Maria Leonor Carvalhão Buescu
Vol. 1 , pp. 21-29
150 views DOI Abstract
2018
Invisible connections. Early Dynastic and Old Kingdom Egyptian metalwork in the Egyptian Museum of Leipzig University
Kmošek, J.
Vol. 96 , pp. 191-207
134 views DOI
2011
The Emirate of Córdoba (756-929 AD) and the introduction of the Egyptian mongoose (Herpestes ichneumon) in Iberia: The remains from Muge, Portugal
Detry, C.
Vol. 38 , pp. 3518-3523
131 views DOI
View All 22 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.