international journal of pharmaceutical sciences review and research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#342 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

international journal of pharmaceutical sciences review and research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name international journal of pharmaceutical sciences review and research
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://globalresearchonline.net
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2016
ultrasound evaluation of spinal cord in newborns with sacral pit
;Narges Afzali;Abdolreza Malek;Sara Ghahremani;Mahboubeh Alipour
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 21-23
509 views DOI Abstract
2016
effects of oral zinc sulfate on hyperbilirubinemia in low-birth-weight neonates
;Ashraf Mohammadzadeh;Ahmadshah Farhat;Ahmad Ghasemian;Mohammad Ramezani;Habibullah Esmaily;Bibi Marziyeh Musavi
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 11-15
323 views Abstract
2017
effect of facilitated tucking created with simulated hands on physiological pain indicators during venipuncture in premature infants
;Nayer Salmani;zohre karjoo;Khadige Dehghani;Alireza Sadeghnia
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 7-12
316 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparison of the therapeutic effects of bubble cpap and ventilator cpap on respiratory distress syndrome in premature neonates
;Mahmoud Noori Shadkam;Mojtaba Movahedinia;Zahra Noori Shadkam;Amir Houshang Mehrparvar
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 1-5
281 views DOI Abstract
2017
prophylactic methylxanthines for preventing extubation failure in the preterm neonates with the gestational age of ≤30 weeks: a randomized controlled trial
;M Shivakumar;Muhammad Najih;Y Ramesh Bhat;Purkayastha Jayashree;Leslie Edward Simon Lewis;Asha Kamath;D Shashikala
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 11-18
279 views DOI Abstract
0000
A study on impact of Perceived Organizational Support (POS), job satisfaction and organizational commitment towards turnover intentions of information technology professionals at Chennai city
Aranganathan, P.
Vol. 38 , pp. 89-96
278 views
2017
subcutaneous emphysema in a healthy child: an unusual clue for the diagnosis of foreign body aspiration
;Seied Mohsen Emami;Mohammad Shurideh Yazdi;Reza Jafarzadeh Esfehani
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 75-77
265 views DOI Abstract
2016
neonatal effects of substance abuse during pregnancy
;Reza Saeidi;Ehsan Mosa Farkhani;Maryam Saeidi;Shokufeh Izadi;Maryam Ziadi lotfabadi
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 40-43
247 views Abstract
2016
effect of education on the awareness of primigravida couples toward infant care
;Maryam Bagheri;Mahin Tafazoli;Zahra Sohrabi
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 30-34
228 views DOI Abstract
2015
a case presentation of voriconazole therapy in a brochopulmonary dysplasia
;Elaheh Amini;Firoozeh Nili;Fatemeh Nayeri;Tahereh Esmaeilnia;Hosein Dalili;Mamak Shariat
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 33-34
223 views Abstract
View All 19 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.