Indexed in Journament

plant and cell physiology

ISSN 0032-0781· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,488 of 29,303 scored journals (34,041 indexed)
123 Articles
Scores higher than 53.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name plant and cell physiology
ISSN 0032-0781
URL http://pcp.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for plant and cell physiology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 34.2 30.6
Accessibility 20.0 23.5
Timeliness 100.0 3.1
Diversity 11.1 25.9
Innovation 3.0 24.1
Community Impact 35.7 6.9
Content Distribution 24.3 89.9
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (123)

2016
a expansão da educação superior no amapá: um estudo sobre o procampo na unifap
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 91-104
283 views DOI Abstract
2016
hourly variability of soil temperature profile in an orchard of mango trees (mangifera indica l.) in the location of cuiarana, salinopolis – pa
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 117-124
234 views DOI Abstract
2017
atividade antifúngica de sideroxylon obtusifolium frente a diferentes espécies de candida sp.
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 95-102
229 views DOI Abstract
2016
fetichismos da carne: consumismo midiático no capitalismo contemporâneo
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 53-65
215 views DOI Abstract
2026
β-GlcY treatment alters transcriptome dynamics and auxin distribution during microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
TurboID proximity labeling combined with structure prediction identifies C3H61/AtTZF5 as a tail-binding protein of Arabidopsis class VIII myosin ATM1
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Disruption of OsNLP4 -mediated nitrate signaling alters root exudate composition and root-associated bacterial communities in rice
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Functional Characterization of Isoflavonoid Synthase CYP736D1 Mediating Oxidative Aryl Migration in a Non-leguminous Plant, Iris germanica (Iridaceae)
22 views DOI Abstract
2026
CALMODULIN-BINDING TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATOR 6 (CAMTA6) functions as a negative regulator of heat-stress response in Arabidopsis
20 views DOI Abstract
2026
Moderate Elevation of Ambient Temperature Alleviates Growth Reduction Caused by Phosphorus Deficiency in Lotus japonicus Under Hydroponic Conditions
26 views DOI Abstract
2026
In vitro Transdifferentiation Approaches for Dissecting Vascular Cell Identity in Arabidopsis
27 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,488 of 29,303 scored
(34,041 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

34.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

3.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

24.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.