klinicheskaia laboratornaia diagnostika | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2041 / 33,955
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

klinicheskaia laboratornaia diagnostika

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name klin lab diagn
Abbreviated Name klin lab diagn
ISSN 0869-2084
Aim and Scope
URL http://elibrary.ru/title_about.asp?id=7849
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2017
[The monitoring of laboratory indices of immune status of healthy children residing in conditions of intensive immunotropic zone of industrial town.]
Prosekova, E V;Sitdikova, T S;Dolgopolov, M S;Turyanskaya, A I;Sabynych, V A;Zabelina, N R;
Vol. 62 , No. 4 , pp. 216-221
367 views DOI Abstract
[Lectins and glycoconjugates in presentation of antigens and protection against patogens.]
Lakhtin, M V;Lakhtin, V M;Аfanasiev, S S;Aleshkin, V A;Mironov, A Yu;
Vol. 63 , No. 10 , pp. 619-625
337 views DOI Abstract
[The comparative characteristic of methods of flow cytofluorometry and optical microscopy in qualitative study of urine elements.]
Chernikov, A V;Samokhodskaya, L M;Dzitiev, V K;Kamalov, A A;
Vol. 63 , No. 4 , pp. 220-223
320 views DOI Abstract
[Method of diagnosis of the severity of the disease attack in patients with ulcerative colitis.]
Tretyakova, Yu I;Bulatova, I A;Shchekotova, A P;Sheludko, V S;
Vol. 63 , No. 7 , pp. 414-418
320 views DOI Abstract
2014
pemanfaatan website direktorat jenderal pajak oleh akuntan pemerintah di kalimantan timur
;Muhammad Subhan;abdul Gafur
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 168-183
263 views Abstract
2012
[The secretory phospholipase A2 and transport of lipids by lipoproteins in patients with the risk of cardio-vascular pathology (the system "score") of lower and average degree. The diagnostic significance of the test].
Ameliushkina, V A;Urazalina, S Zh;Kotkina, T I;Kaba, S I;Titov, V N;
, No. 3 , pp. 4-10
254 views Abstract
2016
factors that affect academic achievement student
;Kurniasari Novi Hardanti
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 91-101
251 views Abstract
2015
analisis indikator yang mempengaruhi auditor dalam memberikan opini going concern pada suatu perusahaan dengan pendekatan isa 570 (perusahaan yang terdaftar di bei periode 2014)
;Lintang Trenggono;Ni Nyoman Alit Triani
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 147-168
229 views Abstract
2012
penerapan strategi it e-commerce sebagai peningkatan persaingan bisnis perusahaan
;Ni Nyoman Alit Triani
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 209-224
222 views Abstract
2013
persepsi aparatur dan penerimaan pbb-p2 sebelum sesudah penerapan pbb-p2 sebagai pajak daerah (studi kasus di kabupaten sidoarjo)
;Alim Nur Siswanti;Junaidi Junaidi;Gita Arasy Harwida
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 99-144
218 views Abstract
View All 15 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.