[The comparative characteristic of methods of flow cytofluorometry and optical microscopy in qualitative study of urine elements.]

Clicks: 355
ID: 34539
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #4 of 15 articles by views in klinicheskaia laboratornaia diagnostika

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The comparative study was carried out concerning methods of flow cytofluorometry and optical microscopy in analysis of urine elements with the purpose of establishing the necessity of verification by physician the results of clinical diagnostic laboratory obtained by the analyzer. The final data concerning comparison of results obtained by two methodologies for various groups of pathology. The participation of physician in validation of results can be avoided in the groups with normal and exceeding standard values of content of corpuscular elements of urine. In the subgroups with pathological elements of urine (transitional and renal epithelium, pathological cylinders, crystals) it is recommended to implement analysis using cytofluorometric technique with subsequent verification by optical microscopy.
Reference Key
chernikovtheklinicheskaia Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Chernikov, A V;Samokhodskaya, L M;Dzitiev, V K;Kamalov, A A;
Journal klinicheskaia laboratornaia diagnostika
Year Year not found
DOI
10.18821/0869-2084-2018-63-4-220-223
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.