BioMed research international | Journament

Journal Ranking

#494 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 14 hours ago

BioMed research international

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name Biomed Res Int
Abbreviated Name biomed res int
ISSN 2314-6141
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (269 total)

2019
Oxidative Stress and Apoptotic Changes in Broiler Chicken Splenocytes Exposed to T-2 Toxin.
Chen, Yuqi;Han, Shunshun;Wang, Yan;Li, Diyan;Zhao, Xiaoling;Zhu, Qing;Yin, Huadong;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 5493870
490 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tissue Composition and Biomechanical Property Changes in the Vaginal Wall of Ovariectomized Young Rats.
Mao, Meng;Li, Yaqian;Zhang, Ye;Kang, Jia;Zhu, Lan;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 8921284
452 views DOI Abstract
2019
First Biomimetic Fixation for Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Investigation in Swine of a Prototype Partial Knee Endoprosthesis.
Rogala, Piotr;Uklejewski, Ryszard;Winiecki, Mariusz;Dąbrowski, Mikołaj;Gołańczyk, Jacek;Patalas, Adam;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 6952649
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gender Differences in Cardiovascular Risk Profile in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Low Disease Activity
Targońska-Stępniak B;Biskup M;Biskup W;Majdan M;;
Vol. 2019 , pp. -
446 views Abstract
2020
Exploring the Key Genes and Pathways in the Formation of Corneal Scar Using Bioinformatics Analysis.
Liu, Binfeng;Li, Ang;Wang, Hongbo;Wang, Jialin;Zhai, Gongwei;Ma, Haohao;Feng, Shiqing;Liu, Liyun;Gao, Yanzheng;
Vol. 2020 , pp. 6247489
433 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quality Characteristics and Functional and Antioxidant Capacities of Algae-Fortified Fish Burgers Prepared from Common Barbel ().
Hentati, Faiez;Barkallah, Mohamed;Ben Atitallah, Ali;Dammak, Mouna;Louati, Ibtihel;Pierre, Guillaume;Fendri, Imen;Attia, Hamadi;Michaud, Philippe;Abdelkafi, Slim;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 2907542
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Root Canal Anatomy of Maxillary First Premolar by Microscopic Computed Tomography in a Chinese Adolescent Subpopulation.
Liu, Xiaojing;Gao, Meili;Ruan, Jianping;Lu, Qun;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 4327046
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Agent-Based Modeling of Employee Protection-Oriented Safety Proactivity Behaviors at Small Scale Enterprises.
Wang, Qiwei;Curcuruto, Matteo;Mei, Qiang;Liu, Suxia;Zhou, Qiaomei;Zhang, JingJing;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 2471418
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Glycopatterns and Glycoproteins Changes in MCN and SCN: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Wang, Ying;Sun, Yufa;Feng, Jia;Li, Zheng;Yu, Hanjie;Ding, Xiang;Yang, Fuquan;Linghu, Enqiang;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 2871289
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preterm Birth, Low Gestational Age, Low Birth Weight, Parity, and Other Determinants of Breech Presentation: Results from a Large Retrospective Population-Based Study.
Noli, Stefania Antonia;Baini, Ilaria;Parazzini, Fabio;Mauri, Paola Agnese;Vignali, Michele;Gerli, Sandro;Favilli, Alessandro;Cipriani, Sonia;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 9581439
391 views DOI Abstract
View All 269 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.