Indexed in Journament

atmospheric environment

ISSN 1352-2310· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,556 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
43 Articles
Scores higher than 53.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name atmospheric environment
ISSN 1352-2310
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/atmospheric-environment

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for atmospheric environment
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 60.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 57.0 27.4
Community Impact 2.9 7.8
Content Distribution 62.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (43)

2003
Measurement of NO2, HNO3, NH3 and SO2 and related particulate matter at a rural site in Rampur, India
Vol. 37 , No. 34 , pp. 4837-4846
354 views
2012
nanoherbals in human healthcare: a proposed research and development roadmap i
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 55-64
331 views DOI Abstract
2017
new approach of highly efficient fermentation process for bioethanol using xylose as agriculture residues
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
300 views DOI Abstract
2017
toughening of bisphenol-a diglycidyl ether-based epoxy by modification with hydroxyl-terminated liquid natural rubber
Vol. 30 , No. 1&2 , pp. 22-28
292 views DOI Abstract
2000
Mobile sources critical review: 1998 NARSTO assessment
Vol. 34 , No. 12-14 , pp. 2161-2181
283 views
2017
effect of substrate feeding concentration on initial biofilm development in anaerobic hybrid reactor
Vol. 20 , No. 3&4 , pp. 361-372
258 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of substrate feeding concentration on initial biofilm development in anaerobic hybrid reactor
Vol. 20 , No. 3&4 , pp. 361-372
258 views DOI Abstract
2017
microbial degradation of endosulfan in agricultural soils
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 233-240
256 views DOI Abstract
2017
the synthesis of a novel bibenzopyran relied on electrooxydation of malloapelta b by cyclic voltammetry
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 387-392
186 views DOI Abstract
2017
the status and quantitative policy of science and technology in thailand
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 114-124
149 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,556 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

57.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.