Journal of water and health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#619 / 33,951
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Journal of water and health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name J Water Health
Abbreviated Name j water health
ISSN 1477-8920
Aim and Scope
URL https://iwaponline.com/jwh
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2019
Survey of US wastewater for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.
Hoelle, Jill;Johnson, James R;Johnston, Brian D;Kinkle, Brian;Boczek, Laura;Ryu, Hodon;Hayes, Sam;
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 219-226
325 views DOI Abstract
2018
Evaluation of a most probable number method for the enumeration of Legionella pneumophila from North American potable and nonpotable water samples.
Petrisek, Ray;Hall, Jonathon;
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 25-33
305 views DOI Abstract
2018
A review of potential factors contributing to epidemic cholera in Yemen.
Al-Gheethi, Adel;Noman, Efaq;Jeremiah David, Bala;Mohamed, Radin;Abdullah, Abd Halid;Nagapan, Sasitharan;Hashim Mohd, Amir;
Vol. 16 , No. 5 , pp. 667-680
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
Kinetics of photocatalytic removal of imidacloprid from water by advanced oxidation processes with respect to nanotechnology.
Derbalah, A;Sunday, M;Chidya, R;Jadoon, W;Sakugawa, H;
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 254-265
291 views DOI Abstract
2016
Well water quality in rural Nicaragua using a low-cost bacterial test and microbial source tracking.
Weiss, Patricia;Aw, Tiong Gim;Urquhart, Gerald R;Galeano, Miguel Ruiz;Rose, Joan B;
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 199-207
277 views DOI Abstract
2013
opportunities for the application of linear program­ming in forest management planning
;Pantić Damjan;Tubić Bojan;Marinković Marko;Borota Dragan;Obradović Snežana
Vol. 2013 , No. 107 , pp. 175-191
256 views DOI Abstract
2010
preference and performance of the gypsy moth cater­pillars on sweet chestnut and some oak species
;Milanović Slobodan
Vol. 2010 , No. 101 , pp. 113-124
253 views DOI Abstract
2012
influence of chemical treatment on dimensional stability of narrow-leaved ash - part one: tangential swelling
;Popović Jasmina;Điporović-Momčilović Milanka
Vol. 2012 , No. 106 , pp. 151-168
252 views DOI Abstract
2019
Analysis of building plumbing system flushing practices and communications
Ragain, L.
Vol. 17 , pp. 196-203
235 views DOI
2003
effect of planting density on diameter structure of black poplar clones s6-7 and m-1 - section aigeiros [duby]
;Andrašev Siniša;Rončević Savo;Bobinac Martin T.
Vol. 2003 , No. 88 , pp. 7-16
217 views DOI Abstract
View All 30 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.