human genetics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1285 / 33,947
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

human genetics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name hum genet
Abbreviated Name hum genet
ISSN 1432-1203
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2019
A review of gene-by-air pollution interactions for cardiovascular disease, risk factors, and biomarkers.
Ward-Caviness, Cavin K;
512 views DOI Abstract
2017
The Y chromosome as the most popular marker in genetic genealogy benefits interdisciplinary research.
Calafell, Francesc;Larmuseau, Maarten H D;
Vol. 136 , No. 5 , pp. 559-573
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rare variants in FANCA induce premature ovarian insufficiency.
Yang, Xi;Zhang, Xiaojin;Jiao, Jiao;Zhang, Feng;Pan, Yuncheng;Wang, Qiqi;Chen, Qing;Cai, Baozhu;Tang, Shuyan;Zhou, Zixue;Chen, Siyuan;Yin, Hao;Fu, Wei;Luo, Yang;Li, Da;Li, Guoqing;Shang, Lingyue;Yang, Jialing;Jin, Li;Shi, Qinghua;Wu, Yanhua;
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Trust in genomic data sharing among members of the general public in the UK, USA, Canada and Australia.
Milne, Richard;Morley, Katherine I;Howard, Heidi;Niemiec, Emilia;Nicol, Dianne;Critchley, Christine;Prainsack, Barbara;Vears, Danya;Smith, James;Steed, Claire;Bevan, Paul;Atutornu, Jerome;Farley, Lauren;Goodhand, Peter;Thorogood, Adrian;Kleiderman, Erika;Middleton, Anna;, ;
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genetic kinship and admixture in Iron Age Scytho-Siberians.
Mary, Laura;Zvénigorosky, Vincent;Kovalev, Alexey;Gonzalez, Angéla;Fausser, Jean-Luc;Jagorel, Florence;Kilunovskaya, Marina;Semenov, Vladimir;Crubézy, Eric;Ludes, Bertrand;Keyser, Christine;
Vol. 138 , No. 4 , pp. 411-423
305 views DOI Abstract
2010
inlassablement raconter l’autre et le passé. les formes du biographique dans l’œuvre de peter ackroyd
;Manon Auger
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. -
248 views Abstract
2015
chronique d’une apocalypse ordinaire. l’amérique mélancolique de nicolas dickner ou comment survivre avec les rognures de la civilisation
;Evelyne Gagnon
Vol. 10 , No. 10 , pp. -
222 views Abstract
2007
le quotidien à l’épreuve du virtuel. promenade de régis jauffret
;Sarah Rocheville
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. -
216 views Abstract
2015
de l’anthropologue comme personnage au roman comme anthropologie ? sur la bête faramineuse, de pierre bergounioux, et naissance d’un pont, de maylis de kerangal
;Éléonore Devevey
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. -
209 views Abstract
2012
Écrire « l’histoire [qui] n’existe pas ». l’enquête généalogique de colombe schneck et de maryline desbiolles
;Evelyne Ledoux-Beaugrand
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. -
189 views Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.