Indexed in Journament

journal of environmental monitoring : jem

ISSN 1464-0325· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,548 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
31 Articles
Scores higher than 33.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Краткое название j environ monit
Сокращённое название j environ monit
ISSN 1464-0325
URL http://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journal/em

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.2
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 52.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of environmental monitoring : jem
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 28.3
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 6.4 11.5
Content Distribution 52.8 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (31)

2003
Bioaccessibility testing of cobalt compounds.
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 675-80
370 views Abstract
2005
River water quality and pollution sources in the Pearl River Delta, China
Vol. 7 , No. 7 , pp. -
339 views Abstract
2007
Highway runoff quality in Ireland.
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 366-71
324 views Abstract
2011
movies and literature to implement the study of contagious diseases
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 341-352
277 views Abstract
2013
la enseñanza de los conceptos de oxidación y de reducción contextualizados en el estudio de la corrosión
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 110-119
251 views Abstract
2007
cuatro experiencias sorprendentes y sencillas con globos
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 343-345
239 views Abstract
2011
la evaluación en el aula de primaria. factor clave para el aprendizaje de las ciencias y las matemáticas
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 212-220
221 views Abstract
2010
una aportaciÓn para las “escuelas sostenibles” en la dÉcada de la educaciÓn para el desarrollo sostenible
Vol. 7 , No. Extraordinario , pp. 363-373
220 views Abstract
2014
ciencia de la sostenibilidad
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 436-438
178 views
2013
does the earth grow up? maybe!
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 120-132
28 views Abstract
2013
la enseñanza de los conceptos de oxidación y de reducción contextualizados en el estudio de la corrosión
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 110-119
251 views Abstract
2012
between mathematics and magic: josephus legend and the down-under shuffle
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 410-421
53 views Abstract
2011
reacciones encadenadas: del reloj de yodo al arco iris químico
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 105-110
196 views Abstract
2011
movies and literature to implement the study of contagious diseases
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 341-352
277 views Abstract
2011
leonardo da vinci y la nutrición humana
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 93-104
155 views Abstract
2011
la evaluación en el aula de primaria. factor clave para el aprendizaje de las ciencias y las matemáticas
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 212-220
221 views Abstract
2011
generación de cónicas con luz láser
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 196-200
200 views Abstract
Journament Score
31.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,548 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

52.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.