Indexed in Journament

Lasers in medical science

ISSN 1435-604X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,166 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 82.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Lasers Med Sci
Abbreviated Name lasers med sci
ISSN 1435-604X
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/10103

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 60.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 15.0 7.8
Content Distribution 71.1 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2019
Correction to: Comparative study using fractional carbon dioxide laser versus glycolic acid peel in treatment of pseudo-acanthosis nigricans.
Zaki, N S;Hilal, R F;Essam, R M;
439 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automatization analysis of the extremely sensitive laser-based dual-mode biomedical sensor.
Masud, Usman;Baig, Muhammad Iram;Zeeshan, Ahmed;
403 views DOI Abstract
2016
regional climate change trends and uncertainty analysis using extreme indices: a case study of hamilton, canada
;Tara Razavi;Harris Switzman;Altaf Arain;Paulin Coulibaly
Vol. 13 , No. C , pp. 43-63
403 views DOI Abstract
2020
The effect of holmium laser resection versus standard transurethral resection on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li, Changlong;Gao, Liang;Zhang, Jindong;Yang, Xiaokang;Liu, Chuan;
391 views DOI Abstract
2017
the adaptive capacity of smallholder farmers to climate change in the northern region of ghana
;Majeed Abdul-Razak;Sylvia Kruse
Vol. 17 , No. C , pp. 104-122
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of two different laser photobiomodulation protocols on the viability of random skin flap in rats.
Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi;Tim, C R;Assis, L;Neves, L M G;Bossini, P S;Renno, A C;Avo, L R S;Liebano, R E;Parizotto, N A;
Vol. 34 , No. 5 , pp. 1041-1047
367 views DOI Abstract
2014
revisiting the ‘disaster and development’ debate – toward a broader understanding of macroeconomic risk and resilience
;Junko Mochizuki;Reinhard Mechler;Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler;Adriana Keating;Keith Williges
Vol. 3 , No. C , pp. 39-54
336 views DOI Abstract
2016
coping with difficult weather and snow conditions: reindeer herders’ views on climate change impacts and coping strategies
;Minna T. Turunen;Sirpa Rasmus;Mathias Bavay;Kimmo Ruosteenoja;Janne Heiskanen
Vol. 11 , No. C , pp. 15-36
333 views DOI Abstract
2014
climate risk management for the u.s. cellulosic biofuels supply chain
;Matthew Langholtz;Erin Webb;Benjamin L. Preston;Anthony Turhollow;Norman Breuer;Laurence Eaton;Anthony W. King;Shahabaddine Sokhansanj;Sujithkumar Surendran Nair;Mark Downing
Vol. 3 , No. C , pp. 96-115
325 views DOI Abstract
2017
experts’ understandings of drinking water risk management in a climate change scenario
;Åsa Boholm;Madeleine Prutzer
Vol. 16 , No. C , pp. 133-144
317 views DOI Abstract
2025
Effect of ultrasonic agitation of methylene blue during the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in reducing viable cells from a multispecies biofilm and endotoxins: an in vitro study.
Alves-Silva, Esdras G;Bronzato, Juliana D;Lopes, Ana B S;Arruda-Vasconcelos, Rodrigo;Louzada, Lidiane M;De-Jesus-Soares, Adriana;Marciano, Marina A;Steiner-Oliveira, Carolina;Gomes, Brenda P F A;
Vol. 40 , No. 1 , pp. 214
98 views DOI Abstract
2020
The effect of holmium laser resection versus standard transurethral resection on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li, Changlong;Gao, Liang;Zhang, Jindong;Yang, Xiaokang;Liu, Chuan;
391 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automatization analysis of the extremely sensitive laser-based dual-mode biomedical sensor.
Masud, Usman;Baig, Muhammad Iram;Zeeshan, Ahmed;
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of two different laser photobiomodulation protocols on the viability of random skin flap in rats.
Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi;Tim, C R;Assis, L;Neves, L M G;Bossini, P S;Renno, A C;Avo, L R S;Liebano, R E;Parizotto, N A;
Vol. 34 , No. 5 , pp. 1041-1047
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
Photobiomodulation by dual-wavelength low-power laser effects on infected pressure ulcers.
Thomé Lima, Maria Maria Côrtes;da Silva Sergio, Luiz Philippe;da Silva Neto Trajano, Larissa Alexsandra;de Souza, Bianca Paschoal;da Motta Mendes, João Pedro;Cardoso, Adriano Fonseca Ribeiro;Figueira, Caroline Pisa;Dos Anjos Tavares, Beatriz;Figueira, Daniella Sousa;Mencalha, André Luiz;Trajano, Eduardo Tavares Lima;de Souza da Fonseca, Adenilson;
216 views DOI Abstract
2019
Low-level laser therapy for weight reduction: a randomized pilot study.
Croghan, Ivana T;Hurt, Ryan T;Schroeder, Darrell R;Fokken, Shawn C;Jensen, Michael D;Clark, Matthew M;Ebbert, Jon O;
263 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correction to: Comparative study using fractional carbon dioxide laser versus glycolic acid peel in treatment of pseudo-acanthosis nigricans.
Zaki, N S;Hilal, R F;Essam, R M;
439 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluating the impact of future climate change on irrigated maize production in kansas
;A. Araya;I. Kisekka;X. Lin;P.V. Vara Prasad;P.H. Gowda;C. Rice;A. Andales
Vol. 17 , No. C , pp. 139-154
230 views DOI Abstract
2017
experts’ understandings of drinking water risk management in a climate change scenario
;Åsa Boholm;Madeleine Prutzer
Vol. 16 , No. C , pp. 133-144
317 views DOI Abstract
2017
the adaptive capacity of smallholder farmers to climate change in the northern region of ghana
;Majeed Abdul-Razak;Sylvia Kruse
Vol. 17 , No. C , pp. 104-122
388 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,166 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

15.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.