Lasers in medical science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1031 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Lasers in medical science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim
Short Name Lasers Med Sci
Abbreviated Name lasers med sci
ISSN 1435-604X
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/10103
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2019
Correction to: Comparative study using fractional carbon dioxide laser versus glycolic acid peel in treatment of pseudo-acanthosis nigricans.
Zaki, N S;Hilal, R F;Essam, R M;
398 views DOI Abstract
2016
regional climate change trends and uncertainty analysis using extreme indices: a case study of hamilton, canada
;Tara Razavi;Harris Switzman;Altaf Arain;Paulin Coulibaly
Vol. 13 , No. C , pp. 43-63
355 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automatization analysis of the extremely sensitive laser-based dual-mode biomedical sensor.
Masud, Usman;Baig, Muhammad Iram;Zeeshan, Ahmed;
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
The effect of holmium laser resection versus standard transurethral resection on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li, Changlong;Gao, Liang;Zhang, Jindong;Yang, Xiaokang;Liu, Chuan;
341 views DOI Abstract
2017
the adaptive capacity of smallholder farmers to climate change in the northern region of ghana
;Majeed Abdul-Razak;Sylvia Kruse
Vol. 17 , No. C , pp. 104-122
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of two different laser photobiomodulation protocols on the viability of random skin flap in rats.
Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi;Tim, C R;Assis, L;Neves, L M G;Bossini, P S;Renno, A C;Avo, L R S;Liebano, R E;Parizotto, N A;
Vol. 34 , No. 5 , pp. 1041-1047
324 views DOI Abstract
2016
coping with difficult weather and snow conditions: reindeer herders’ views on climate change impacts and coping strategies
;Minna T. Turunen;Sirpa Rasmus;Mathias Bavay;Kimmo Ruosteenoja;Janne Heiskanen
Vol. 11 , No. C , pp. 15-36
287 views DOI Abstract
2014
climate risk management for the u.s. cellulosic biofuels supply chain
;Matthew Langholtz;Erin Webb;Benjamin L. Preston;Anthony Turhollow;Norman Breuer;Laurence Eaton;Anthony W. King;Shahabaddine Sokhansanj;Sujithkumar Surendran Nair;Mark Downing
Vol. 3 , No. C , pp. 96-115
280 views DOI Abstract
2014
revisiting the ‘disaster and development’ debate – toward a broader understanding of macroeconomic risk and resilience
;Junko Mochizuki;Reinhard Mechler;Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler;Adriana Keating;Keith Williges
Vol. 3 , No. C , pp. 39-54
278 views DOI Abstract
2017
experts’ understandings of drinking water risk management in a climate change scenario
;Åsa Boholm;Madeleine Prutzer
Vol. 16 , No. C , pp. 133-144
268 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.