regional climate change trends and uncertainty analysis using extreme indices: a case study of hamilton, canada

Clicks: 405
ID: 245608
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #2 of 21 articles by views in Lasers in medical science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study aims to provide a deeper understanding of the level of uncertainty associated with the development of extreme weather frequency and intensity indices at the local scale. Several different global climate models, downscaling methods, and emission scenarios were used to develop extreme temperature and precipitation indices at the local scale in the Hamilton region, Ontario, Canada. Uncertainty associated with historical and future trends in extreme indices and future climate projections were also analyzed using daily precipitation and temperature time series and their extreme indices, calculated from gridded daily observed climate data along with and projections from dynamically downscaled datasets of CanRCM4 and PRECIS, and the statistically downscaled CIMP5 ensemble. A bias correction technique was applied to all raw daily temperature and precipitation time series prior to calculation of the indices. All climate models predicted increasing trends for extreme temperature indices, maximum 1-day and 5-day precipitation (RX1day and RX5day), total wet day precipitation (PRCPTOT), very heavy precipitation days (R20mm), Summer Days (SU), and Tropical Nights (TR) and decreasing trend for Forest Days (FD) and Ice Days (ID) in 2020s, 2050s, and 2080s compared to present. CanRCM4 model did consistently project values in the upper range of the CMIP5 ensemble while the PRECIS ensemble was more in-line with the CMIP5 mean values. This difference may however be a function of different emission scenarios used.
Reference Key
razavi2016climateregional Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Tara Razavi;Harris Switzman;Altaf Arain;Paulin Coulibaly
Journal Lasers in medical science
Year 2016
DOI
10.1016/j.crm.2016.06.002
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.