Effect of ultrasonic agitation of methylene blue during the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in reducing viable cells from a multispecies biofilm and endotoxins: an in vitro study.
Clicks: 103
ID: 281416
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
103 views
29 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #20 of 21 articles by views in Lasers in medical science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of the agitation of an ultrasonic photosensitizer during the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in reducing multispecies biofilm composed of E. faecalis, C. albicans, and E. coli and endotoxins (LPS) within the root canals. Thirty lower premolars were contaminated and randomly divided into three groups (n = 10). Group 1 (G1) used saline solution as a control, G2 (aPDT) used a photosensitizer (0.005% methylene blue with 3 min) applied into the root canal followed by a red laser (100 mW power, 9 J of energy, for 90 s), and G3 (aPDT + U) used 0.005% methylene blue activated by ultrasound for 20 s followed by the application of a red laser as described in G2. The effectiveness of each protocol was determined through colony forming units per milliliter count (CFU/mL), and the levels of LPS were quantified by using the Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate technique. The data was statistically analyzed at a 5% level of significance. Viable bacteria were detected in all three groups, with a mean of 2.82 × 10 CFU/mL. The saline group was not effective in reducing viable counts or LPS levels (P > 0.05). The aPDT group resulted in a 56.27% reduction compared to baseline samples and aPDT + U promoted a 56.97% reduction in viable microorganisms from the biofilm. LPS was detected in all samples with a mean of 18.84 EU/mL. Saline was not effective in reducing LPS levels (P > 0.05). aPDT was effective in reducing LPS levels (P < 0.05) with a mean of 1.7 EU/mL. aPDT + U promoted additional LPS removal compared to the aPDT group (P < 0.05), with a mean of 0.02 EU/mL. For both CFU and LPS analyses, aPDT and aPDT + U were more effective than the control group, while aPDT + U was more effective than aPDT. In conclusion, ultrasonic activation of the photosensitizer during the aPDT increased antimicrobial activity against a mature multispecies biofilm, while lowering the LPS levels.
| Reference Key |
alvessilva2025effectlasers
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Alves-Silva, Esdras G;Bronzato, Juliana D;Lopes, Ana B S;Arruda-Vasconcelos, Rodrigo;Louzada, Lidiane M;De-Jesus-Soares, Adriana;Marciano, Marina A;Steiner-Oliveira, Carolina;Gomes, Brenda P F A; |
| Journal | Lasers in medical science |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s10103-025-04448-1
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.