Indexed in Journament

bioscience biotechnology and biochemistry

ISSN 0916-8451· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
53.7 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #66 of 29,299 scored journals (34,034 indexed)
97 Articles
Scores higher than 99.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name bioscience biotechnology and biochemistry
ISSN 0916-8451

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.8
Timeliness 100.0
Community Impact 34.3
Content Distribution 53.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for bioscience biotechnology and biochemistry
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.8 30.6
Accessibility — 23.3
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity — 25.9
Innovation — 24.1
Community Impact 34.3 6.6
Content Distribution 53.5 89.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (97)

2026
Regulatory T cells link food and the immune system
94 views DOI Abstract
2026
<i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> shikimate kinase inhibitory activity of a glycodidepside mixture from <i>Cosmospora</i> sp. BioMCC-f.T-7332
68 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effect of <i>Aronia melanocarpa</i> extracts on allergic responses in mast cells
65 views DOI Abstract
2026
Structural and biochemical analyses of a lasso peptide natural product containing an unusual disulfide bond between consecutive cysteines
60 views DOI Abstract
2007
Improved Gateway Binary Vectors: High-Performance Vectors for Creation of Fusion Constructs in Transgenic Analysis of Plants
60 views DOI Abstract
2026
2026
Long-term antibiotic treatment attenuates the development of food allergy in a murine model
57 views DOI Abstract
1998
HPLC Method for Evaluation of the Free Radical-scavenging Activity of Foods by Using 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl
55 views DOI Abstract
2026
Recent Chemical Advances in C -Glycosidic Ellagitannins
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Loss of PRMT-7 extends lifespan but impairs heat-stress responses in Caenorhabditis elegans
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
2026
Fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals endophytic and epiphytic root colonization of the novel plant growth-promoting bacterium Citrobacter sedlakii CESi7
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
2026
Dietary Equisetum arvense Polysaccharides Alleviate Obesity in Aged Mice Associated with Altered Gut Microbiota
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Fibroblast growth factor 21 promotes re-epithelialization through the ERK pathways during wound healing
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
An eight-ketohexose stereoisomer screen identifies d -allulose as a stereoselective suppressor of AGE-related autofluorescence in Caenorhabditis elegans
15 views DOI Abstract
2026
Onion’s ability to reduce feeding and weight in fat-fed obese mice: its induction by cut and incubation at room temperature
17 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
53.7/100 · Average
Ranked #66 of 29,299 scored
(34,034 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

53.7/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

53.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.