Indexed in Journament

annual review of materials science

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.2/100
Journament Score
#7,244
Journament Rank
24
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name annual review of materials science

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2017
hepatitis c virus genie: a web 2.0 interpretation and analytics platform for the versant hepatitis c virus genotype line probe assay version 2.0
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 41-41
343 views DOI Abstract
2011
use of a laboratory information system driven tool for pre-signout quality assurance of random cytopathology reports
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 42-42
339 views DOI Abstract
1988
Recent advances in solid-state NMR of zeolites
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 189-218
336 views
2014
the 2013 symposium on pathology data integration and clinical decision support and the current state of field
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 2-2
312 views DOI Abstract
2014
guidelines from the canadian association of pathologists for establishing a telepathology service for anatomic pathology using whole-slide imaging
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 15-15
309 views DOI Abstract
2013
eliminating tissue-fold artifacts in histopathological whole-slide images for improved image-based prediction of cancer grade
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 22-22
307 views DOI Abstract
2012
different tracks for pathology informatics fellowship training: experiences of and input from trainees in a large multisite fellowship program
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 30-30
295 views DOI Abstract
2013
diagnostic digital cytopathology: are we ready yet?
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 28-28
283 views DOI Abstract
2011
autofocus methods of whole slide imaging systems and the introduction of a second-generation independent dual sensor scanning method
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 44-44
281 views DOI Abstract
2017
alchemy: a web 2.0 real-time quality assurance platform for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis c virus, and bk virus quantitation assays
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 18-18
230 views DOI Abstract
2017
hepatitis c virus genie: a web 2.0 interpretation and analytics platform for the versant hepatitis c virus genotype line probe assay version 2.0
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 41-41
343 views DOI Abstract
2017
making pathology diagnoses with glass or digital slides: which modality is inferior?
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 14-14
179 views DOI
2017
a reduced set of features for chronic kidney disease prediction
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 24-24
246 views DOI Abstract
2017
implementation of epic beaker anatomic pathology at an academic medical center
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 47-47
250 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of android smartphones for telepathology
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 16-16
279 views DOI Abstract
2014
implementation of large-scale routine diagnostics using whole slide imaging in sweden: digital pathology experiences 2006-2013
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 14-14
213 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.