Indexed in Journament

annual review of materials science

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #7,511 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 74.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name annual review of materials science

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 57.0
Community Impact 2.1
Content Distribution 82.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity — 25.8
Innovation 57.0 27.4
Community Impact 2.1 7.8
Content Distribution 82.6 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2017
hepatitis c virus genie: a web 2.0 interpretation and analytics platform for the versant hepatitis c virus genotype line probe assay version 2.0
;Alex M Dussaq;Abha Soni;Christopher Willey;Seung L Park;Shuko Harada
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 41-41
374 views DOI Abstract
2017
development and implementation of a coagulation factor testing method utilizing autoverification in a high-volume clinical reference laboratory environment
;Paul W Riley;Benoit Gallea;Andre Valcour
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 25-25
370 views DOI Abstract
2011
use of a laboratory information system driven tool for pre-signout quality assurance of random cytopathology reports
;Sonal Kamat;Anil V Parwani;Walid E Khalbuss;Sara E Monaco;Susan M Kelly;Luke T Wiehagen;Anthony L Piccoli;Karen M Lassige;Liron Pantanowitz
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 42-42
366 views DOI Abstract
1988
Recent advances in solid-state NMR of zeolites
Klinowski, J
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 189-218
356 views
2014
the 2013 symposium on pathology data integration and clinical decision support and the current state of field
;Jason M Baron;Anand S Dighe;Ramy Arnaout;Ulysses J Balis;W Stephen Black-Schaffer;Alexis B Carter;Walter H Henricks;John M Higgins;Brian R Jackson;JiYeon Kim;Veronica E Klepeis;Long P Le;David N Louis;Diana Mandelker;Craig H Mermel;James S Michaelson;Rakesh Nagarajan;Mihae E Platt;Andrew M Quinn;Luigi Rao;Brian H Shirts;John R Gilbertson
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 2-2
336 views DOI Abstract
2014
guidelines from the canadian association of pathologists for establishing a telepathology service for anatomic pathology using whole-slide imaging
;Chantal Bernard;S A Chandrakanth;Ian Scott Cornell;James Dalton;Andrew Evans;Bertha M Garcia;Chris Godin;Marek Godlewski;Gerard H Jansen;Amin Kabani;Said Louahlia;Lisa Manning;Raymond Maung;Lisa Moore;Joanne Philley;Jack Slatnik;John Srigley;Alain Thibault;Donald Daniel Picard;Hanah Cracower;Bernard Tetu
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 15-15
331 views DOI Abstract
2013
eliminating tissue-fold artifacts in histopathological whole-slide images for improved image-based prediction of cancer grade
;Sonal Kothari;John H Phan;May D Wang
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 22-22
326 views DOI Abstract
2012
different tracks for pathology informatics fellowship training: experiences of and input from trainees in a large multisite fellowship program
;Bruce P Levy;David S McClintock;Roy E Lee;William J Lane;Veronica E Klepeis;Jason M Baron;Maristela L Onozato;JiYeon Kim;Victor Brodsky;Bruce Beckwith;Frank Kuo;John R Gilbertson
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 30-30
318 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of android smartphones for telepathology
;Donald Ekong;Fang Liu;G Thomas Brown;Arunima Ghosh;Paul Fontelo
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 16-16
313 views DOI Abstract
2013
diagnostic digital cytopathology: are we ready yet?
;Jarret C House;Evita B Henderson-Jackson;Joseph O Johnson;Mark C Lloyd;Jasreman Dhillon;Nazeel Ahmad;Ardeshir Hakam;Walid E Khalbuss;Marino E Leon;David Chhieng;Xiaohui Zhang;Barbara A Centeno;Marilyn M Bui
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 28-28
311 views DOI Abstract
2017
alchemy: a web 2.0 real-time quality assurance platform for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis c virus, and bk virus quantitation assays
;Emmanuel Agosto-Arroyo;Gina M Coshatt;Thomas S Winokur;Shuko Harada;Seung L Park
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 18-18
248 views DOI Abstract
2017
hepatitis c virus genie: a web 2.0 interpretation and analytics platform for the versant hepatitis c virus genotype line probe assay version 2.0
;Alex M Dussaq;Abha Soni;Christopher Willey;Seung L Park;Shuko Harada
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 41-41
374 views DOI Abstract
2017
making pathology diagnoses with glass or digital slides: which modality is inferior?
;Jonhan Ho;Liron Pantanowitz
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 14-14
204 views DOI
2017
development and implementation of a coagulation factor testing method utilizing autoverification in a high-volume clinical reference laboratory environment
;Paul W Riley;Benoit Gallea;Andre Valcour
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 25-25
370 views DOI Abstract
2017
compromising the security of “generating unique identifiers from patient identification data using security models”
;Arran Schlosberg
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 17-17
205 views DOI
2017
a reduced set of features for chronic kidney disease prediction
;Rajesh Misir;Malay Mitra;Ranjit Kumar Samanta
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 24-24
288 views DOI Abstract
2017
implementation of epic beaker anatomic pathology at an academic medical center
;John Larry Blau;Joseph D Wilford;Susan K Dane;Nitin J Karandikar;Emily S Fuller;Debbie J Jacobsmeier;Melissa A Jans;Elisabeth A Horning;Matthew D Krasowski;Bradley A Ford;Kent R Becker;Jeanine M Beranek;Robert A Robinson
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 47-47
281 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of android smartphones for telepathology
;Donald Ekong;Fang Liu;G Thomas Brown;Arunima Ghosh;Paul Fontelo
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 16-16
313 views DOI Abstract
2014
implementation of large-scale routine diagnostics using whole slide imaging in sweden: digital pathology experiences 2006-2013
;Sten Thorstenson;Jesper Molin;Claes Lundström
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 14-14
236 views DOI Abstract
2014
utility of alert-based cdss in cpoe to improve compliance with plasma transfusion guidelines
;Richard C Friedberg
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 6-6
249 views
Journament Score
36.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #7,511 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

57.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

82.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.