annual review of materials science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2202 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

annual review of materials science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name annual review of materials science
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (24 total)

1988
Recent advances in solid-state NMR of zeolites
Klinowski, J
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 189-218
329 views
2017
development and implementation of a coagulation factor testing method utilizing autoverification in a high-volume clinical reference laboratory environment
;Paul W Riley;Benoit Gallea;Andre Valcour
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 25-25
324 views DOI Abstract
2017
hepatitis c virus genie: a web 2.0 interpretation and analytics platform for the versant hepatitis c virus genotype line probe assay version 2.0
;Alex M Dussaq;Abha Soni;Christopher Willey;Seung L Park;Shuko Harada
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 41-41
323 views DOI Abstract
2011
use of a laboratory information system driven tool for pre-signout quality assurance of random cytopathology reports
;Sonal Kamat;Anil V Parwani;Walid E Khalbuss;Sara E Monaco;Susan M Kelly;Luke T Wiehagen;Anthony L Piccoli;Karen M Lassige;Liron Pantanowitz
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 42-42
320 views DOI Abstract
2014
the 2013 symposium on pathology data integration and clinical decision support and the current state of field
;Jason M Baron;Anand S Dighe;Ramy Arnaout;Ulysses J Balis;W Stephen Black-Schaffer;Alexis B Carter;Walter H Henricks;John M Higgins;Brian R Jackson;JiYeon Kim;Veronica E Klepeis;Long P Le;David N Louis;Diana Mandelker;Craig H Mermel;James S Michaelson;Rakesh Nagarajan;Mihae E Platt;Andrew M Quinn;Luigi Rao;Brian H Shirts;John R Gilbertson
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 2-2
293 views DOI Abstract
2013
eliminating tissue-fold artifacts in histopathological whole-slide images for improved image-based prediction of cancer grade
;Sonal Kothari;John H Phan;May D Wang
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 22-22
291 views DOI Abstract
2014
guidelines from the canadian association of pathologists for establishing a telepathology service for anatomic pathology using whole-slide imaging
;Chantal Bernard;S A Chandrakanth;Ian Scott Cornell;James Dalton;Andrew Evans;Bertha M Garcia;Chris Godin;Marek Godlewski;Gerard H Jansen;Amin Kabani;Said Louahlia;Lisa Manning;Raymond Maung;Lisa Moore;Joanne Philley;Jack Slatnik;John Srigley;Alain Thibault;Donald Daniel Picard;Hanah Cracower;Bernard Tetu
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 15-15
290 views DOI Abstract
2012
different tracks for pathology informatics fellowship training: experiences of and input from trainees in a large multisite fellowship program
;Bruce P Levy;David S McClintock;Roy E Lee;William J Lane;Veronica E Klepeis;Jason M Baron;Maristela L Onozato;JiYeon Kim;Victor Brodsky;Bruce Beckwith;Frank Kuo;John R Gilbertson
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 30-30
287 views DOI Abstract
2013
diagnostic digital cytopathology: are we ready yet?
;Jarret C House;Evita B Henderson-Jackson;Joseph O Johnson;Mark C Lloyd;Jasreman Dhillon;Nazeel Ahmad;Ardeshir Hakam;Walid E Khalbuss;Marino E Leon;David Chhieng;Xiaohui Zhang;Barbara A Centeno;Marilyn M Bui
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 28-28
264 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of android smartphones for telepathology
;Donald Ekong;Fang Liu;G Thomas Brown;Arunima Ghosh;Paul Fontelo
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 16-16
258 views DOI Abstract
View All 24 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.