Indexed in Journament

ultramicroscopy

ISSN 1879-2723· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,248 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
10 Articles
Scores higher than 41.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ultramicroscopy
Abbreviated Name ultramicroscopy
ISSN 1879-2723
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505679/description#description

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 28.5
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 85.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 28.5 25.7
Community Impact 10.0 5.8
Content Distribution 85.9 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (10)

2019
Carbon Nanospikes: Synthesis, characterization and application for high resolution AFM.
Obraztsova, Ekaterina A;Basmanov, Dmitry V;Barinov, Nikolai A;Klinov, Dmitry V;
Vol. 197 , pp. 11-15
430 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modeling and correction of image pixel hysteresis in atomic force microscopy.
Sun, Baishun;Cao, Liang;Lu, Zhengcheng;Xie, Chenchen;Song, Zhengxun;Weng, Zhankun;Wang, Zuobin;
Vol. 213 , pp. 112992
351 views DOI Abstract
2017
evolution of subclinical myocardial dysfunction detected by two-dimensional and three-dimensional speckle tracking in asymptomatic type 1 diabetic patients: a long‑-term follow-up study
;Anne Ringle;Anne Dornhorst;Michaela B Rehman;Cristina Ruisanchez;Petros Nihoyannopoulos
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 73-81
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ni-base superalloy single crystal (SX) mosaicity characterized by the Rotation Vector Base Line Electron Back Scatter Diffraction (RVB-EBSD) method.
Thome, P;Medghalchi, S;Frenzel, J;Schreuer, J;Eggeler, G;
Vol. 206 , pp. 112817
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Carrier profiling with fast Fourier transform scanning spreading resistance microscopy: A case study for Ge, GaAs, InGaAs, and InP
Dixon-Luinenburg, O.
Vol. 206 , pp. 0-0
288 views DOI
2016
a meta-analysis for the echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular structure and function in arvc: a study by the research and audit committee of the british society of echocardiography
;Mohammad Qasem;Victor Utomi;Keith George;John Somauroo;Abbas Zaidi;Lynsey Forsythe;Sanjeev Bhattacharrya;Guy Lloyd;Bushra Rana;Liam Ring;Shaun Robinson;Roxy Senior;Nabeel Sheikh;Mushemi Sitali;Julie Sandoval;Richard Steeds;Martin Stout;James Willis;David Oxborough
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 95-104
278 views DOI Abstract
2017
transesophageal echocardiographic guidance of transcatheter closure of the aortic valve in a patient with left ventricular assist device-related severe aortic regurgitation
;Preetham R Muskala;Taiyeb M Khumri;Michael L Main
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 17-19
271 views DOI Abstract
2020
Investigating local oxidation processes in Fe thin films in a water vapor environment by in situ liquid cell TEM
Key, J.
Vol. 209 , pp. 0-0
253 views DOI
2017
an uncommon manifestation of shock: takotsubo syndrome
;Ying X Gue;Sanjay S Bhandari;Mubarak Ahamed
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. K41-K45
251 views DOI Abstract
2020
Direct visualization of magnetic domain wall motion in Nd-Fe-B magnets by alternating magnetic force microscopy using Co-GdO superparamagnetic tip.
Cao, Yongze;Zhao, Yue;Tang, Jin;Du, Haifeng;Zhou, Yan;Saito, Hitoshi;
Vol. 212 , pp. 112980
230 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modeling and correction of image pixel hysteresis in atomic force microscopy.
Sun, Baishun;Cao, Liang;Lu, Zhengcheng;Xie, Chenchen;Song, Zhengxun;Weng, Zhankun;Wang, Zuobin;
Vol. 213 , pp. 112992
351 views DOI Abstract
2020
Direct visualization of magnetic domain wall motion in Nd-Fe-B magnets by alternating magnetic force microscopy using Co-GdO superparamagnetic tip.
Cao, Yongze;Zhao, Yue;Tang, Jin;Du, Haifeng;Zhou, Yan;Saito, Hitoshi;
Vol. 212 , pp. 112980
230 views DOI Abstract
2020
Investigating local oxidation processes in Fe thin films in a water vapor environment by in situ liquid cell TEM
Key, J.
Vol. 209 , pp. 0-0
253 views DOI
2019
Carrier profiling with fast Fourier transform scanning spreading resistance microscopy: A case study for Ge, GaAs, InGaAs, and InP
Dixon-Luinenburg, O.
Vol. 206 , pp. 0-0
288 views DOI
2019
Ni-base superalloy single crystal (SX) mosaicity characterized by the Rotation Vector Base Line Electron Back Scatter Diffraction (RVB-EBSD) method.
Thome, P;Medghalchi, S;Frenzel, J;Schreuer, J;Eggeler, G;
Vol. 206 , pp. 112817
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Carbon Nanospikes: Synthesis, characterization and application for high resolution AFM.
Obraztsova, Ekaterina A;Basmanov, Dmitry V;Barinov, Nikolai A;Klinov, Dmitry V;
Vol. 197 , pp. 11-15
430 views DOI Abstract
2017
an uncommon manifestation of shock: takotsubo syndrome
;Ying X Gue;Sanjay S Bhandari;Mubarak Ahamed
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. K41-K45
251 views DOI Abstract
2017
evolution of subclinical myocardial dysfunction detected by two-dimensional and three-dimensional speckle tracking in asymptomatic type 1 diabetic patients: a long‑-term follow-up study
;Anne Ringle;Anne Dornhorst;Michaela B Rehman;Cristina Ruisanchez;Petros Nihoyannopoulos
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 73-81
334 views DOI Abstract
2017
transesophageal echocardiographic guidance of transcatheter closure of the aortic valve in a patient with left ventricular assist device-related severe aortic regurgitation
;Preetham R Muskala;Taiyeb M Khumri;Michael L Main
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 17-19
271 views DOI Abstract
2016
a meta-analysis for the echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular structure and function in arvc: a study by the research and audit committee of the british society of echocardiography
;Mohammad Qasem;Victor Utomi;Keith George;John Somauroo;Abbas Zaidi;Lynsey Forsythe;Sanjeev Bhattacharrya;Guy Lloyd;Bushra Rana;Liam Ring;Shaun Robinson;Roxy Senior;Nabeel Sheikh;Mushemi Sitali;Julie Sandoval;Richard Steeds;Martin Stout;James Willis;David Oxborough
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 95-104
278 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,248 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

28.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

85.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.