Indexed in Journament

american journal of science

ISSN 0002-9599· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,500 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
8,486 Articles
Scores higher than 16.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name american journal of science
ISSN 0002-9599

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Timeliness 70.0
Innovation 16.5
Community Impact 2.1
Content Distribution 17.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for american journal of science
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 70.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 16.5 27.4
Community Impact 2.1 7.8
Content Distribution 17.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (8,486)

2009
Methane and the CH4 related greenhouse effect over the past 400 million years
1,392 views DOI Abstract
2002
Overview of hydrothermal activity associated with active orogenesis and metamorphism: Nanga Parbat, Pakistan Himalaya
Vol. 302 , No. 8 , pp. 726-748
308 views DOI Abstract
2022
Understanding the isotopic composition of sedimentary sulfide: A multiple sulfur isotope diagenetic model for Aarhus Bay
44 views DOI Abstract
2025
EPR Dating of Clay Minerals Formation Through Geological Times: Benchmarking From the Quaternary to the Neoproterozoic Era
40 views DOI Abstract
2025
Plio-Pleistocene Western Retroarc Magmatic Evolution and Its Relation With Variable Subduction Settings in the Southern Central Andes (34-38 °S)
38 views DOI Abstract
2020
2014
Resistant cellulose-derivative biopolymer templates in natural sepiolite
36 views DOI Abstract
2022
Weathering intensity and lithium isotopes: A reactive transport perspective
35 views DOI Abstract
2025
Balancing Redox Budgets: Mechanisms for Prolonging Anoxia During Major Carbon Burial Events
21 views DOI Abstract
2025
2025
A Physical Model for Accurate Paleotemperature Reconstruction From Fluid Inclusions in Halite
18 views DOI Abstract
2025
EPR Dating of Clay Minerals Formation Through Geological Times: Benchmarking From the Quaternary to the Neoproterozoic Era
40 views DOI Abstract
2025
Serpentinites of the Guatemala Suture Zone: Varieties, Origin, and Compositional Modification
17 views DOI Abstract
2025
Cambrian Foreland Phosphogenesis in the Khuvsgul Basin of Mongolia
26 views DOI Abstract
2025
Plio-Pleistocene Western Retroarc Magmatic Evolution and Its Relation With Variable Subduction Settings in the Southern Central Andes (34-38 °S)
38 views DOI Abstract
2025
Silicate Weathering and Diagenetic Reaction Balances in Deltaic Muds
16 views DOI Abstract
2025
Partial Molar Volumes in Highly Siliceous Melts and the Relationship to Liquid Immiscibility
17 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,500 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

16.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

17.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.