Serpentinites of the Guatemala Suture Zone: Varieties, Origin, and Compositional Modification

Clicks: 36
ID: 304633
2025
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #15 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Serpentinite belts in central Guatemala are exemplars of multiple emplacement systems involving accretion, collisional, and oblique-slip tectonics along a plate boundary. The Guatemala Suture Zone straddles the Motagua River (and Suture Zone) along most of the river’s length. To the north lie the Baja Verapaz, Sierra de Santa Cruz, and smaller Juan de Paz ophiolites, while to the south are slivers of the ophiolitic El Tambor volcano-sedimentary sequence. Between the ophiolite units are two exhumed serpentinite mélanges, the North Motagua Mélange, north of, and the South Motagua Mélange, south of the Motagua River. Ophiolite units host lizardite/chrysotile (Lz/Ctl) serpentinites, while mélanges are dominated by antigorite serpentinites. Hundreds of serpentinites are documented from several belts, and phase assemblages, serpentine mineral identification, and compositional trends in serpentine composition are reported. These provide insights into petrological and tectonic processes associated with serpentinite origins. First, both mélanges, traditionally interpreted as exhumed serpentinized mantle wedge plus tectonic blocks, are mostly antigoritites but are interleaved by tectonics with slivers of Lz/Ctl serpentinites. Second, all serpentines have compositions that reflect the replaced peridotite minerals with serpentine minerals that provide inferences about serpentinizing fluids. Serpentine compositions can be either supersilicic or subsilicic without evidence of extra phases, arguing for interlayer intergrowths in the serpentine. Magnetite abundance and antigorite composition Mg/(Mg+Fe) (Mg#*) covary inversely in antigoritites, but whole rock Mg#* is essentially constant. Rather than changing f O 2 over time to produce and then remove magnetite to explain the different abundances of magnetite, formation of magnetite-poor antigoritites at higher T (>>400°C, but <650°C) than the others is a simpler explanation. Finally, brucite, an expected product of peridotite serpentinization, is essentially absent in these rocks; excess MgO is present as carbonate or talc, implying addition of CO 2 and SiO 2 by the serpentinizing fluids. Admixture of two types of serpentinites in mélanges is interpreted as a complex tectonic process either sampling mantle wedge with overriding obducted seafloor or fault juxtaposition of slivers of mantle wedge and ophiolitic/slab origin.
Reference Key
openalex_W4408797657 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors George E. Harlow, Kennet E. Flores, Céline Martin, Virginia B. Sisson, S. S. Sorensen
Journal american journal of science
Year 2025
DOI
10.2475/001c.129404
URL
https://doi.org/10.2475/001c.129404
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.