handbook of heterogeneous catalysis | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4929 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

handbook of heterogeneous catalysis

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name handbook of heterogeneous catalysis
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2008
Preparation of Solid Catalysts: Zeolites and Related Molecular Sieves: A Synoptic Guide to the Structures of Zeolitic and Related Solid Catalysts
Thomas J.
Vol. 1-5 , pp. 286-310
402 views DOI
2018
post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in kurt vonnegut’s slaughterhouse-five
;Bakhtiar Sadjadi ;Nishtman Bahrami
Vol. 06 , No. 01 , pp. 81-92
248 views Abstract
2018
relationship between gender and learning of american slang by iranian efl students: a study following kolb’s learning styles model
;Mariam Biabani ;Siros Izadpanah
Vol. 06 , No. 01 , pp. 134-142
244 views Abstract
2017
study of the interpreting techniques used by the tourist guides in the tourism attractions of north sumatra
;Bambang Panca Syahputra;Amrin Saragih;Syahron Lubis;Muhizar Muchtar
Vol. 05 , No. 03 , pp. 14-20
216 views Abstract
2014
challenges in translating colloquial egyptian arabic poetry into english: the case of register and metaphors-a contrastive study
;B. A. Essam ;Esra'a Mustafa
Vol. 02 , No. 03 , pp. 14-22
216 views Abstract
2018
intelligibility of language learners to native speakers: evidence from iranian esl learners conversing with canadians
;Mohammad Saber Khaghaninejad ;Rahim Fahandejsaadi
Vol. 06 , No. 01 , pp. 93-104
206 views Abstract
2018
digital games, songs and flashcards and their effects on vocabulary knowledge of iranian preschoolers
;Mahboubeh Taghizadeh;Shahin Vaezi;Maria Ravan
Vol. 05 , No. 04 , pp. 156-171
192 views Abstract
2018
free online translators: a comparative assessment in terms of idioms and phrasal verbs
;Marziyeh Taleghani;Ehsan Pazouki
Vol. 06 , No. 01 , pp. 15-19
180 views Abstract
2018
investigating the effect of harmer’s esa elements on reading comprehension of iranian efl learners: a task-based approach
;Hadi Shokri
Vol. 05 , No. 03 , pp. 48-60
173 views Abstract
2014
a model for cognitive process of neologisms translation
;Seyed Mohammad Moghadas ;Masoud Sharififar
Vol. 02 , No. 01 , pp. 04-19
165 views Abstract
View All 20 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.