Indexed in Journament

3 Biotech

ISSN 2190-572X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,784 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
41 Articles
Scores higher than 49.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name 3 Biotech
Abbreviated Name 3 biotech
ISSN 2190-572X
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/13205

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.1 5.8
Content Distribution 68.8 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (41)

2017
editorial: platforms and ecosystems (september 2017)
;Chris McPhee;Ozgur Dedehayir;Marko Seppänen
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. 3-5
587 views DOI
2017
The effects of pesticides on morphology, viability, and germination of Blackberry (Rubus glaucus Benth.) and Tree tomato (Solanum betaceum Cav.) pollen grains.
Padilla, Flavio;Soria, Norman;Oleas, Abrahan;Rueda, Darwin;Manjunatha, Bangeppagari;Kundapur, Rajesh R;Maddela, Naga Raju;Rajeswari, Bugude;
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 154
513 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of copper nanoparticles on physico-chemical properties of chitosan and gelatin-based scaffold developed for skin tissue engineering application.
Kumari, Shikha;Singh, Bhisham Narayan;Srivastava, Pradeep;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 102
497 views DOI Abstract
2019
A comparative study of chemically synthesized and leaf extract-mediated silver nanoparticles.
Kumar, Varun;Wadhwa, Ridhima;Kumar, Nitesh;Maurya, Pawan Kumar;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 7
491 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nanotechnology based therapeutic application in cancer diagnosis and therapy.
Singh, Ragini;
Vol. 9 , No. 11 , pp. 415
454 views DOI Abstract
2016
Impact of forest vegetation on soil characteristics: a correlation between soil biological and physico-chemical properties
Chandra L.
Vol. 6 , pp. 0-0
435 views DOI
2013
editorial: living labs and crowdsourcing (december 2013)
;Chris McPhee;Mika Westerlund;Seppo Leminen
, No. December 2013: Living Labs and Crowdsourcing , pp. 3-5
430 views Abstract
2019
Evaluation of immuno-modulating effect of recombinant heat shock protein 40 of in mice.
Minhas, Priyanka;Sunil Kumar, B V;Verma, Ramneek;
Vol. 9 , No. 10 , pp. 366
392 views DOI Abstract
2020
Integrated miRNA-seq analysis reveals the molecular mechanism underlying the effect of acupuncture on endometrial receptivity in patients undergoing fertilization: embryo transplantation
Mu, Y.
Vol. 10 , pp. 0-0
378 views DOI
2019
Production of humic acids by solid-state fermentation of Trichoderma reesei in raw oil palm empty fruit bunch fibers
Volpi, M.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
336 views DOI
2023
Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of family genes in Cassava ( Crantz).
Muthusamy, Senthilkumar K;Pushpitha, P;Makeshkumar, T;Sheela, M N;
Vol. 13 , No. 10 , pp. 341
147 views DOI Abstract
2023
Formulation of lemongrass oil (Cymbopogon citratus)-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles: an in vitro assessment study
Ali, A.
Vol. 13 , pp. 0-0
131 views DOI Abstract
2021
Biotechnological approaches in management of oomycetes diseases.
Sharma, Sanjeev;Sundaresha, S;Bhardwaj, Vinay;
Vol. 11 , No. 6 , pp. 274
276 views DOI Abstract
2020
Sonohydrolysis using an enzymatic cocktail in the preparation of free fatty acid.
Souza, José E S;Monteiro, Rodolpho R C;Rocha, Thales G;Moreira, Katerine S;Cavalcante, Francisco T T;de Sousa Braz, Ana K;de Souza, Maria C M;Dos Santos, José C S;
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. 254
326 views DOI Abstract
2020
Enhanced production of lipstatin from mutant of and fed-batch strategies under submerged fermentation.
Khushboo, ;Pinki, ;Kumar, Punit;Tripathi, Archana;Luthra, Umesh;Dubey, Kashyap Kumar;
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 151
266 views DOI Abstract
2020
DNA barcoding as a valuable molecular tool for the certification of planting materials in bamboo.
Dev, Suma Arun;Sijimol, K;Prathibha, P S;Sreekumar, V B;Muralidharan, E M;
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 59
267 views DOI Abstract
2020
Integrated miRNA-seq analysis reveals the molecular mechanism underlying the effect of acupuncture on endometrial receptivity in patients undergoing fertilization: embryo transplantation
Mu, Y.
Vol. 10 , pp. 0-0
378 views DOI
2019
Evaluation of immuno-modulating effect of recombinant heat shock protein 40 of in mice.
Minhas, Priyanka;Sunil Kumar, B V;Verma, Ramneek;
Vol. 9 , No. 10 , pp. 366
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nanotechnology based therapeutic application in cancer diagnosis and therapy.
Singh, Ragini;
Vol. 9 , No. 11 , pp. 415
454 views DOI Abstract
2019
Production of humic acids by solid-state fermentation of Trichoderma reesei in raw oil palm empty fruit bunch fibers
Volpi, M.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
336 views DOI
Journament Score
32.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,784 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.