editorial: living labs and crowdsourcing (december 2013)
Clicks: 431
ID: 207166
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
431 views
40 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #7 of 41 articles by views in 3 Biotech
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (0 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
mcphee2013technologyeditorial:
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Chris McPhee;Mika Westerlund;Seppo Leminen |
| Journal | 3 Biotech |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Information technology
Innovation
Entrepreneurship
risk management
research
case study
cybersecurity
canada
competitiveness
cyberattacks
commercialization
applied research
intellectual property
partnership
living labs
open innovation
crowdsourcing
r&d
technology entrepreneurship
entrepreneurial orientation
incubation
network security
industrial management
market lifecycletechnology (general)management
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.