Indexed in Journament

t\"urk ya\csam bilimleri dergisi

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,916 of 33,995 indexed journals
33 Articles
Accessibility 15
Engagement 28
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name t\"urk ya\csam bilimleri dergisi

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

2013
scale of operation, allocative inefficiencies and separability of inputs and outputs in agricultural research
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 399-415
301 views Abstract
2011
valuation of american interest rate options by the least-squares monte carlo method
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 521-541
250 views DOI Abstract
2005
otimização nos padrões de corte de chapas de fibra de madeira reconstituída: um estudo de caso
Vol. 25 , No. 3 , pp. 391-415
248 views DOI Abstract
2014
an experimental comparison of biased and unbiased random-key genetic algorithms
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 143-164
246 views DOI Abstract
2000
uma análise da influência da estocasticidade das informações sobre um modelo de programação linear
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 101-116
243 views DOI Abstract
2007
time to failure assessment of products at service conditions from accelerated lifetime tests with stress-dependent spread in life
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 209-233
238 views DOI Abstract
mathematical modelling and solution approaches for production planning in a chemical industry
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 311-331
228 views DOI Abstract
2002
otimização de entropia: implementação computacional dos princípios maxent e minxent
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 37-59
214 views DOI Abstract
2015
industrial insights into lot sizing and scheduling modeling
Vol. 35 , No. 3 , pp. 439-464
78 views DOI Abstract
2014
an experimental comparison of biased and unbiased random-key genetic algorithms
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 143-164
246 views DOI Abstract
2014
defense-attack interaction over optimally designed defense systems via games and reliability
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 215-235
128 views DOI Abstract
2014
locating public schools in fast expanding areas: application of the capacitated p-median and maximal covering location models
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 301-317
107 views DOI Abstract
2013
scale of operation, allocative inefficiencies and separability of inputs and outputs in agricultural research
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 399-415
301 views Abstract
2013
some results about the connectivity of trees
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 123-132
164 views Abstract
2012
decision support model for selecting and evaluating suppliers in the construction industry
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 643-662
102 views DOI Abstract
2011
valuation of american interest rate options by the least-squares monte carlo method
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 521-541
250 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,916 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

28.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.