t\"urk ya\csam bilimleri dergisi | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5243 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
28
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

t\"urk ya\csam bilimleri dergisi

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name t\"urk ya\csam bilimleri dergisi
Abbreviated Name
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2013
scale of operation, allocative inefficiencies and separability of inputs and outputs in agricultural research
;Geraldo da Silva e Souza;Eliane Gonçalves Gomes
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 399-415
282 views Abstract
2017
Baz\i Hidrazon T\"urevlerinin Antioksidan, Antikolinesteraz \.Inhibisyon, Tirozinaz \.Inhibisyon ve \"Ureaz \.Innhibisyon Aktivitelerinin Ara\cst\ir\ilmas\i
SICAK, Yusuf
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 165-170
266 views
2011
valuation of american interest rate options by the least-squares monte carlo method
;Claudia Dourado Cescato;Eduardo Facó Lemgruber
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 521-541
224 views DOI Abstract
2007
time to failure assessment of products at service conditions from accelerated lifetime tests with stress-dependent spread in life
;Enrique López Droguett;Ali Mosleh
Vol. 27 , No. 2 , pp. 209-233
218 views DOI Abstract
2005
otimização nos padrões de corte de chapas de fibra de madeira reconstituída: um estudo de caso
;Luciano Belluzzo;Reinaldo Morabito
Vol. 25 , No. 3 , pp. 391-415
217 views DOI Abstract
2014
an experimental comparison of biased and unbiased random-key genetic algorithms
;José Fernando Gonçalves;Mauricio G.C. Resende;Rodrigo F. Toso
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 143-164
214 views DOI Abstract
2000
uma análise da influência da estocasticidade das informações sobre um modelo de programação linear
;Neida Maria Patias Volpi;Celso Carnieri;Carlos Roberto Sanquetta
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 101-116
211 views DOI Abstract
mathematical modelling and solution approaches for production planning in a chemical industry
;Artur Lovato Cunha;Maristela Oliveira Santos
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 311-331
209 views DOI Abstract
2014
an evolutionary study on crop production in small farm systems in the mid-west region of brazil based on a linear programming model
;Maria Amelia Biagio
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 251-273
202 views DOI Abstract
2002
otimização de entropia: implementação computacional dos princípios maxent e minxent
;Rogério Silva de Mattos;Álvaro Veiga
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 37-59
188 views DOI Abstract
View All 33 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
28
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

28.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.