Índice multicritério de bem estar social rural em um município da região amazônica
Clicks: 209
ID: 168234
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
209 views
28 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #12 of 33 articles by views in t\"urk ya\csam bilimleri dergisi
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Neste artigo propôs-se a construção de um índice multicritério para avaliar o bem estar social de um grupo de agricultores. Abreviadamente, o índice foi designado de "bem estar rural". Para a construção do índice foram considerados aspectos relacionados às condições de habitação, saúde, trabalho e infra-estrutura. Na determinação dos pesos para a construção do índice, usou-se tanto a abordagem MACBETH clássica, quanto uma variante otimista, que leva em conta os pesos mais favoráveis dentro do intervalo definido pelo MACBETH. Esta atitude é motivada por uma premissa de otimismo. Esta justifica-se pelo fato de os pesquisadores de campo terem constatado que os agricultores valorizavam mais aquilo que possuíam em detrimento do que não tinham. Os resultados da aplicação desse modelo indicaram uma tendência de crescimento médio do bem estar rural, no grupo avaliado.
In this paper we proposed a multicriteria index to evaluate rural social welfare. This index was named "rural welfare". We took into account some criteria related to health, work, infrastructure and type of habitation. We used the classical MACBETH approach and an optimistic variation to determine the weights. The last one uses the most favorable weights (for each farmer) belonging to an interval defined by the MACBETH, instead of the MACBETH weights themselves. This approach was motivated by an optimist behavior assumption. This premise is justified as the field researchers noticed that the rural producers overvalue their belongings and under-evaluate things that they do not have. The results showed that the rural welfare has, in average, growth tendency for the group of family farmers under evaluation.
In this paper we proposed a multicriteria index to evaluate rural social welfare. This index was named "rural welfare". We took into account some criteria related to health, work, infrastructure and type of habitation. We used the classical MACBETH approach and an optimistic variation to determine the weights. The last one uses the most favorable weights (for each farmer) belonging to an interval defined by the MACBETH, instead of the MACBETH weights themselves. This approach was motivated by an optimist behavior assumption. This premise is justified as the field researchers noticed that the rural producers overvalue their belongings and under-evaluate things that they do not have. The results showed that the rural welfare has, in average, growth tendency for the group of family farmers under evaluation.
| Reference Key |
gomes2008pesquisandice
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Eliane Gonçalves Gomes;João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de Mello;João Alfredo de Carvalho Mangabeira |
| Journal | t\"urk ya\csam bilimleri dergisi |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0101-74382008000100008
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.