international journal of surgical oncology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2336 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

international journal of surgical oncology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name international journal of surgical oncology
Abbreviated Name international journal of surgical oncology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2019
Outcome of Cervical Lymph Nodes Dissection for Thyroid Cancer with Nodal Metastases: A Southeast Asian 3-Year Experience
Lim, Raymond Z. M.;Ooi, Juin Y.;Tan, Jih H.;Tan, Henry C. L.;Sikin, Seniyah M.;Lim, Raymond Z. M.;Ooi, Juin Y.;Tan, Jih H.;Tan, Henry C. L.;Sikin, Seniyah M.;
Vol. 2019
383 views DOI Abstract
2013
performa oksidasi metan pada reaktor kontinyu dengan peningkatan ketebalan lapisan biocover landfill
;Opy Kurniasari;Tri Padmi;Edwan Kardena;Enri Damanhuri
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. 179-186
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prognostic Factors and Survival Time in Patients with Small Bowel Tumors: A Retrospective Observational Study
Taghipour Zahir, Shokouh;Heidarymeybodi, Zahra;AleSaeidi, Sogol;Taghipour Zahir, Shokouh;Heidarymeybodi, Zahra;AleSaeidi, Sogol;
Vol. 2019
351 views DOI Abstract
2012
Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatectomy: Definitions, Risk Factors, Preventive Measures, and Management—Review
Machado, Norman Oneil;
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
335 views Abstract
2019
Oral Submucous Fibrosis in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Protocol for Management
Jain, Anuj;Taneja, Saumya;Jain, Anuj;Taneja, Saumya;
Vol. 2019
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Thoracic Wall: More Prone to Higher Mortality, and Local Recurrence—A Single Institution Long-Term Follow-up Study
Soerensen, Tine Rytter;Raedkjaer, Mathias;Jørgensen, Peter Holmberg;Hoejsgaard, Anette;Safwat, Akmal;Baad-Hansen, Thomas;Soerensen, Tine Rytter;Raedkjaer, Mathias;Jørgensen, Peter Holmberg;Hoejsgaard, Anette;Safwat, Akmal;Baad-Hansen, Thomas;
Vol. 2019
315 views DOI Abstract
2014
analisa pemanfaatan kompos sebagai media biocover di tempat pemrosesan akhir sampah: studi kasus kota depok, jawa barat
;Gabriel Andari Kristanto;Dwi Rahayu;Evy Novita
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 117-125
288 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Concise Review of Pelvic Radiation Therapy (RT) for Rectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases
Sager, Omer;Dincoglan, Ferrat;Demiral, Selcuk;Uysal, Bora;Gamsiz, Hakan;Dirican, Bahar;Beyzadeoglu, Murat;Sager, Omer;Dincoglan, Ferrat;Demiral, Selcuk;Uysal, Bora;Gamsiz, Hakan;Dirican, Bahar;Beyzadeoglu, Murat;
Vol. 2019
267 views DOI Abstract
2019
Postsurgical Ultrasound Evaluation of Patients with Prosthesis in Acellular Dermal Matrix: Results from Monocentric Experience
Laura, Ballesio;Alice, Casinelli;Silvia, Gigli;Cristiana, Boldrini;Giuseppe, Di Taranto;Antonio, Albano;Giuseppina, Onesti Maria;Laura, Ballesio;Alice, Casinelli;Silvia, Gigli;Cristiana, Boldrini;Giuseppe, Di Taranto;Antonio, Albano;Giuseppina, Onesti Maria;
Vol. 2019
259 views DOI Abstract
2012
konversi katalitik minyak sawit untuk menghasilkan biofuel menggunakan silika alumina dan hzsm-5 sintesis
;Nurjannah Nurjannah;Achmad Roesyadi;Danawati Hari Prajitno
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 37-43
192 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.